Search for: "Beene v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 125,955
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2015, 1:30 am
On 15-16 July the Supreme Court heard the case of United States of America v Nolan regarding the respondent’s redundancy following the closure of her US military base, RSA Hythe. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:48 am
Regina (ZO (Somalia)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (MM (Burma)) v Same [2010] UKSC 36; [2010] WLR (D) 203 “An asylum seeker who made a new application for asylum after his original application for asylum had finally failed, was entitled to the benefits conferred by the European Directive setting minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 8:49 pm
The post State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
The post State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 6:55 am
The post SHAWN LAMONT GODWIN, JR. v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:43 am
The post CALVIN RODNEY BUTLER v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:04 am
The court said that only one extension of this rule had been recognized: Pursuant to State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:04 am
The court said that only one extension of this rule had been recognized: Pursuant to State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:58 am
United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 7:53 pm
”) The post State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 1:58 am
ZT (Kosovo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department House of Lords “When a claim for asylum had been rejected as clearly unfounded under section 94(2) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, and the claimant made further submissions, the Secretary of State for the Home Department had to consider whether those further submissions created [...] [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:48 am
See Cone v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:17 am
R (MM (Burma) and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (DT (Eritrea)) v Same [2009] EWCA Civ 442; [2009] WLR (D) 166 “A person whose asylum claim had been finally determined in country A against him or her and who made a subsequent claim for asylum in country A came within the [...] [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 6:49 am
What in [MSS v Belgium and Greece [2011] ECHR 108] was held to be a sufficient condition of intervention has been made by NS into a necessary one. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 7:17 am
On August 25, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:56 am
HH (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; AM (Somalia) v Same; J (Somalia) v Same; MA (Somalia) v Same; [2010] EWCA Civ 42; ; [2010] WLR (D) 107 “Where the route and manner of return of an illegal immigrant to a safe haven were known or could be implied, the first tier tribunal had to consider whether the claimant would be put at risk if returned by that route. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 2:06 am
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; SM (Zimbabwe) v Same; AM (Zimbabwe) v Same; DM (Zimbabwe) v Same [2010] EWCA Civ 1285; [2010] WLR (D) 295 “A claim for asylum would not be defeated if the tribunal found that a claimant would be willing to lie about political beliefs, or about the absence of political beliefs, but that the reason for the lie was to avoid persecution. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 4:59 am
United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968), Richardson v. [read post]
