Search for: "Bias v. Woods" Results 81 - 100 of 140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Since the coming into force of section 11 Defamation Act 2013, trial by jury in a defamation claim is only appropriate where there is a real prospect of “involuntary bias” on the part of any judge who was called upon to try the issues in the case, and when that could be overcome by ordering a trial by jury. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
(GRAY on Claims)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Blocking attorneys from simultaneously litigating and prosecuting patents: In re Deutsche Bank Trust (Patently-O) CAFC: Muscle ad in magazine invalidates patent: Iovate Health Science Inc v Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition Inc (IPKat) (IP Directions) CAFC: If patent troll sends the letter, then a case-or-controversy ‘implicitly’ is asserted: HP v Acceleron (ISinIP) District Court S D Florida denies… [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 6:13 pm
Flores, Justice Souter's dissent in Alden v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  The work has been comprehensively updated to take in the latest case including Lachaux, Stocker, Serafin, Lloyd v Google, Economou, Wright v Ver, Wright v Granath, Corbyn v Millett, Duchess of Sussex v Associated, and Soriano v Forensic News. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by John Elwood
  And so it was that, as foretold, respondent in four-time relist Woods v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 6:41 am by Joy Waltemath
The appeals court found that the board made its determination to terminate the employee without relying on any of the fire chief’s statements or actions (Woods v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:24 am by SHG
  And should Marvin be speaking in your neck of the woods, take the time to go. [read post]