Search for: "Billings v. Social Security Administration" Results 81 - 100 of 802
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
Activists have taken to redress the problem by advocating for nugatory “warnings” from remote suppliers, in the face of employer failures to monitor and supervise workers and the workplace, and to provide administrative, engineering, and personal protective controls. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am by Unknown
According to Conwell, his first fund raised money from a diverse group of investors via Rule 506(c) of Regulation D and a social media campaign (Rule 506(c) allows for general solicitation in some instances). [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
For example, some state officials banned the consideration of social or political interests when making investment decisions for state pension funds or have redirected state funds away from large asset managers because these officials claim the companies are prioritising political and social agendas over duties to clients. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
A little spice was added by the indulgence in the rhetoric of setting up of improbable targets followed by solemn pledges of defense (social security and medicare for example). [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court Asks Biden Administration to Weigh in on Social Media Case MSN – Robert Barnes and Cat Zakrzewski (Washington Post) | Published: 1/23/2023 The U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
It also puts users’ privacy and security (including minors’!) [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 7:32 am by Stewart Baker
It does not get more cyberlawyerly than a case the Supreme Court will be taking up this term—Gonzalez v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:55 pm by Stewart Baker
It does not get more cyberlawyerly than a case the Supreme Court will be taking up this term – Gonzalez v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Online Safety Bill returned to Parliament this week, and the government published a policy paper providing an overview of the expected impact of changes to the bill. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm by Chris Skelton
As part of our commitment to educating ordinary Americans about their legal rights, Justia provides Justia Legal Guides. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:00 am by Guest Author
In addition to advising FDR on antitrust and serving as first general counsel to the NLRB, Handler, Zelig-like, played key roles in many of the super-statutes and administrative innovations that ultimately generated the modern American legislative-regulatory (Leg-Reg) state: the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act of 1938, the Temporary National Economic Committee (TNEC), Lend-Lease, the War Refugee Board, the GI Bill, and the Social Security Act amendments that… [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
The third is the security apparatus superstructure, which remains intact and committed and against which resistance would require a substantial effort to destabilize. [read post]
Anderson on developments in foreign relations and international law, Stephanie Pell on cyber issues, Alan Rozenshtein on social media and content moderation, Daniel Byman and J. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:03 am by Unknown
Title V of Division AA of the FY23 appropriations bill would provide for a registration exemption for small business mergers and acquisitions brokers by amending Exchange Act Section 15(b) to add a new subsection (13). [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 9:22 pm by Race to the Bottom
The argument goes that companies that misclassify employees do not contribute to unemployment compensation funds, payroll taxes, or Social Security and Medicare taxes and leave companies in compliance with the bill. [read post]