Search for: "Bills v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 19,966
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2021, 3:13 am
Defendant’s failure to lodge a timely, specific objection to the billing was insufficient to rebut any inference of an agreement to pay the stated amount (see Shaw v Silver, 95 AD3d 416 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
31 May 2016, 9:36 am
Griswold v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 4:18 am
Federal preemption of state medical fee schedules and regulations are a prevailing challenge to the patchwork of non-uniform state benefit programs.EagleMed, LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:20 pm
This morning, the Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:34 pm
In Lyon et al. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:06 am
The case was Trump v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:38 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 5:44 am
See Puppies ‘N Love v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 10:06 am
Facts: This case (Collins v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion and Order in the following matter: DA 11-0651, 2011 MT 283, BILL GENE THOMAS, Petitioner and Appellant, v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
In its decision, the Court stated that it received multiple applications, many of which challenged the Bill based on its violations against the Charter-protected rights of workers. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
In its decision, the Court stated that it received multiple applications, many of which challenged the Bill based on its violations against the Charter-protected rights of workers. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 11:25 am
Ann Wagner introduced the “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017” bill, H.R. 1865. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:30 pm
” Justice Kavanaugh’s concurring opinion in NCAA v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 4:23 pm
The working text of the bill -- which goes under The Notice Pleading Restoration Act of 2009 -- says: Except as otherwise expressly provided by an act of Congress or by an amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which takes effect after the date of enactment of this Act, a Federal court shall not dismiss a complaint under rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, except under the standards set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Conley… [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
Weiss & Assocs v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:17 am
State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:58 am
In the 2020 US Supreme Court case Bostock v. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:58 pm
But the mantra has not been about states v.... [read post]
