Search for: "Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives"
Results 81 - 100
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
Res. 5 provides:(A) The House authorizes the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the One Hundred Thirteenth Congress— (i) to act as successor in interest to the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the One Hundred Twelfth Congress with respect to civil actions in which it intervened in the One Hundred Twelfth Congress to defend the constitutionality of section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (1 U.S.C. 7) or… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:02 pm
House of Representatives in oppositionReply of petitioner Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:47 pm
" The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (BLAG) argued that the third characteristic, that the group have a distinguishing characteristic, sometimes couched as "immutability," did not apply because sexual orientation is "not necessarily fixed," but can "range along a continuum. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:16 pm
Cali)Petition for certiorariBrief of respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives in opposition (forthcoming)Brief of respondent Karen Golinski in support In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:21 pm
The petition of the day is: Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:27 am
At the Huffington Post, Scottie Thomaston has coverage of an amicus brief filed recently by Indiana and fourteen other states in Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
§ 632, “arises” out of international or foreign banking transactions when the significant legal issues in the case are directly related to such transactions.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (6th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition (forthcoming) Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:04 pm
The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:56 pm
The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) of the House of Representatives [official website] requested the motion [JURIST report]... [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 am
United States, 10-cv-8435. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:07 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has posted online at this link the Brief of Intervenor-Appellant Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
27 May 2012, 2:56 pm
Because the Obama administration announced in 2011 that it had concluded that DOMA was unconstitutional and therefore it would no longer defend DOMA in court, the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (BLAG) argued in defense of the statute. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:42 pm
The judge in the case denied a motion to dismiss that case on procedural grounds in January of this year and granted the House Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group’s motion to intervene in the case to defend DOMA. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will be represented by the U.S. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Speak of the House of Representatives, John Boehner then decided to have the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) appoint outside counsel to defend DOMA in Ms. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
While the motions pended, the Department of Justice decided DOMA was unconstitutional and ceased defending the statute.Speak of the House of Representatives, John Boehner then decided to have the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) appoint outside counsel to defend DOMA in Ms. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am
The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of The United States House of Representatives (BLAG), defending DOMA in Windsor, filed its Memorandum on August 1, vigorously asserting that rational basis is the correct standard and that DOMA easily satisfies it. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 4:20 am
New York Law Journal reports that on Monday, lawyers for the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:03 am
" The brief for the House Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, by contrast, relies almost entirely on the stare decisis effect of High-Tech Gays and other Ninth Circuit precedents. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:30 am
As background: The politicians, a group of House members calling themselves the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, authorized the General Counsel of the House on March 14, 2011 to retain a law firm to support Section III of the Defense of Marriage Act against constitutional challenge in United States federal courts. [read post]
