Search for: "Black v. Cook"
Results 81 - 100
of 289
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2014, 10:55 pm
In Covidien LP v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:22 am
Cooke, Tex. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 10:40 am
Calhoun v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:00 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 3:30 pm
Slice potatoes using the 7 mm blade of your v-slicer. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 2:08 pm
Black history month is just around the corner. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 6:52 am
Whether a mark is registered in colour or in black is not regarded as a wholly negligible element in the eyes of consumers (Pico Food v OHIM, T‑623/11).There are also differences between the dominant elements of the marks at issue: the human figure in the earlier mark represents a man standing on one foot, whereas the lower limbs of the human figure in the mark applied for are not depicted. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 5:53 pm
Okin v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:49 pm
Not accidental which depictions get deemed raw v. cooked, though not entirely determinative. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:09 am
For a survey of this research, see, for example, V. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 11:33 am
For example, Black people in Cook County, IL make up 24% of the population, yet represent 70% of people on EM. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:29 am
It literally was in black and white in the policy. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:43 pm
The comment was made in relation to an earlier tweet posted on Sainsbury’s account, which expressed support for Black History Month. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 11:30 am
Mississippi (1898) and Plessy v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:30 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Loving v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 8:00 am
Martin v. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 8:15 am
” Tamalunis v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm
” United States v. [read post]
