Search for: "Black v. Cook" Results 81 - 100 of 295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2020, 2:14 pm
Cooke’s Seafood, 835 F.2d 1364, 1366 (11th Cir. 1988); see also Strict, Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019) (“Absolute; requiring no showing of fault. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 2:08 pm by Brett Trout
Black history month is just around the corner. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 6:52 am
Whether a mark is registered in colour or in black is not regarded as a wholly negligible element in the eyes of consumers (Pico Food v OHIM, T‑623/11).There are also differences between the dominant elements of the marks at issue: the human figure in the earlier mark represents a man standing on one foot, whereas the lower limbs of the human figure in the mark applied for are not depicted. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Not accidental which depictions get deemed raw v. cooked, though not entirely determinative. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:09 am by Dianne Saxe
For a survey of this research, see, for example, V. [read post]
25 May 2021, 5:30 am by Joy
Here are our leading legal headlines for the week of May 25, 2021 from Wise Law on Twitter:How a workplace investigation at York University has left this Black professor and his supporters crying foul‘Alarming’ lack of clear strategy for LGBTQ inclusion practices across federal government, new report findsThis could be the case that takes down Roe v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 11:33 am by Stephanie Lacambra
For example, Black people in Cook County, IL make up 24% of the population, yet represent 70% of people on EM. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
The comment was made in relation to an earlier tweet posted on Sainsbury’s account, which expressed support for Black History Month. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 11:30 am by Mark Graber
Mississippi (1898) and Plessy v. [read post]