Search for: "Bliss v. Bliss" Results 81 - 100 of 200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2015, 3:33 am by Jani Ihalainen
Birthdays are a peculiar phenomenon when fully dissected and thought through, yet they evoke an image of youthful bliss and happiness, along with often copious amounts of presents and sugary foods. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 6:45 pm by Colin O'Keefe
The Pros and Cons of Mandatory Workplace Flu Vaccination – Ivo Becica and Alexander V. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
In the most recent case on the topic, Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:45 am
" And here's a great poet: "Ah why refuse the blameless bliss? [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 5:25 am by Cari Rincker
Hartog, 85 N.Y.2d 36 (1995) (maintenance ends upon death of either spouse); Bliss v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 10:48 am by Eric Guttag
With the Supreme Court’s most recent foray into the patent-eligibility world in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 10:48 am by Eric Guttag
With the Supreme Court’s most recent foray into the patent-eligibility world in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 3:19 am by David DePaolo
I've blogged before that presumptions in workers' compensation tend to prolong litigation and make for bad precedence, and a recent California case highlights that concern.The First District Court of Appeals in California will decide whether a municipal employer had successfully rebutted the presumption of industrial causation for a novice police officer's colon cancer in light of evidence that the disease takes decades to develop.In City of Paso Robles v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:47 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
By Kathryn “Chris” Palamountain and Kate Birenbaum Containing a local business dispute that had, at least temporarily, been blown into a nationwide class action, the First District Court of the Texas Court of Appeals in Houston recently overturned a trial court’s certification of claims brought on behalf of a class of persons whose personal information may (or may not) have been obtained from the trash – the case of Bliss & Glennon Inc. v. [read post]