Search for: "Bonn v. Bonn"
Results 81 - 100
of 369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2020, 1:00 am
The court remanded trademark infringement and other claims brought by dietary supplement seller Charles Curry to the federal district court in Chicago for further proceedings (Curry v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 1:37 pm
Toujours selon la SÉPAQ, les communiqués faisaient état « [d’]informations véridiques, justifiées et proportionnelles à la situation intenable créée par le comportement du Syndicat. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:37 am
In affirming the federal district court’s dismissal of Neutron Depot’s suit alleging infringement of the INSURANCE DEPOT mark against Bankrate, the Fifth Circuit concluded that Neutron Depot did not own the mark outright at any point when the infringement took place (Neutron Depot, LLC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 1:00 pm
En définitive, la conciliation des règles commerciales et des demandes formulées par les citoyens, véhiculées par les normes morales, pourrait être satisfaite à l’aide du mécanisme de l’exception commerciale de moralité publique. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 8:37 am
The General Court denies likelihood of confusion, contrary to EUIPO In one of its last decisions in the old year (judgment of 19 December 2019, T-40/19, Amigüitos pets & live v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:09 am
& Sons Edible Oils Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:55 pm
" Bonn v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 5:11 am
The court also affirmed two district court rulings on remedies; specifically, that FI is not entitled to recover JFTCO’s profits and that a permanent injunction precluding JFTCO from ever using the Fabick family name was not necessary (Fabick, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 12:11 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit found that all of Engage’s asserted marks were merely descriptive and lacked secondary meaning, including sole only mark the district court deemed valid mark but not infringed by Intellisphere (Engage Healthcare Communications, LLC v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision to dismiss an attorney’s challenge of his bar license suspension as the attorney’s procedural and substantive challenges to the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s disciplinary proceeding were rejected (Piccone v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:31 am
Fields Famous Brands, LLC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:58 am
À son arrivée au bureau du médecin désigné par l’employeur, ce dernier se trouve dans son véhicule par hasard et l’observe. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 8:14 am
The General Court (GC) judgment of 17 October 2019, Case T-279/18, Alliance Pharmaceuticals Limited v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:59 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in a summary order affirming the district court’s judgment (Oneida Indian Nation v. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 3:58 am
En conséquence, le recours à la procédure de modification prévue à la partie V (art. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 12:37 am
Later, on 16 October 2019, the Advocate General (AG) at the CJEU delivered his much-awaited opinion in the matter Sky v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 1:14 am
In the latest bad faith case, Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:23 am
Cameron Malone-BrownOn 16 October 2019, the long-awaited opinion of Advocate General Tanchev was handed down in the case of Sky Plc & Ots v SkyKick UK Ltd & Anr (Case C-371/18). [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 12:55 am
Therefore the TTAB was correct in granting the petition of competitor Ambev S.A. to cancel the mark due to abandonment (Cervejaria Petropolis SA v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 2:00 am
The defendant invoked the judgment of the EU General Court in Micro Leader v. [read post]
