Search for: "Bourne v. Bourne" Results 81 - 100 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2010, 9:48 pm by Ben Sheffner
After nearly three years of discovery, the parties in the massive Viacom v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
District Court Judge Ferguson issued a final injunction (FTC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:46 pm by MacIsaac
 The below quote is a useful summary of this area of personal injury law: [15] The plaintiff relies on the following passage in Bourne v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 2:23 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) DA (Colombia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 682 (13 July 2009) Bourne Leisure Ltd (t/a British Holidays) v Marsden [2009] EWCA Civ 671 (13 July 2009) Highland Crusader Offshore Partners LP & Ors v Deutsche Bank AG & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 725 (13 July 2009) Court of [...] [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 1:46 pm
Click for court documents for Viacom v YouTube and Premier League v YouTube. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 7:35 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has today issued its ruling in John Doe v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 4:10 pm
Bourne has posted Richardson v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:16 am
I am off to listen to some Gilbert & Sullivan…. or, perhaps, read Henry V again. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 8:47 am
This holding was adopted and arguably expanded in later cases, most notably Suntrust v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 9:19 pm
” The proposed order permanently enjoins defendants from deriving compensation from the sale or manufacture of furniture, or colorable imitations thereof, from Bourne’s furniture lines, including THE LEAF COLLECTION.The parties also agreed to dismiss all of their claims and counterclaims against each other with prejudice, without fees or costs to any party.The case cite is Bourne International, Inc. v. [read post]