Search for: "Brady v. C. I. R" Results 81 - 100 of 105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2011, 4:19 am by Gideon
I wrote almost a month ago about the CT Supreme Court’s extraordinary decision in State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
(EPLAW) Cheapflights: OHIM excludes likelihood of confusion between conflicting signs, due to very low degree of distinctive character of earlier marks: T-460/09; T-461/09  (Class 46) General Court upholds opposition brought  by PEPE JEANS against PEPEQUILLO CTM application: T-580/08 (Class 46) Royal treatment rejected in Luxembourg: T-397/09 (Class 46) ‘G’: Emram v OHIM: Guilty against Gucci (Class 46) General Court: summer time I and II – ‘Space… [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Washington, No. 07-1523, 07-1884, 07-2541 Federal district courts lack the inherent power to vacate a sentence procured by fraud, any such power having been abrogated by the enactment of 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c) and the amendments to FRCP 35. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
There is a 5RB case comment on the decision of the Court of Appeal  in R v Markham upholding the removal of anonymity from two children convicted of murder. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:50 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
During 2010, Kevin Brady and I reviewed approximately 300 decisions from Delaware’s Supreme Court and Court of Chancery on corporate and commercial issues. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Muksasey , No. 07-3115 Where an alien whose previous visa application has been denied receives a visa after providing false information about his/her identity, that conduct constitutes willful misrepresentation of a material fact for purposes of 8 U.S.C. section 1182(a)(6)(C)(i). [read post]