Search for: "Brady v. State of Louisiana*"
Results 81 - 100
of 132
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2012, 5:59 am
So, Connick v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:22 am
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Connick v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 1:52 pm
As Justice Calogero notes in his OpEd, the responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:35 am
Brady of the Middle District of Louisiana to one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud and one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States and to pay and receive health care kickbacks. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:11 pm
” The Court found that this was clearly a Brady [v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:59 pm
Supreme Court had an opportunity in Smith v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
United States, 11-7650, Bagu v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:23 am
The case Smith v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
That office long has been notorious for ignoring or disregarding Brady obligations, although the Court last term in Connick v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:42 pm
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 9:56 am
The Court held that the substantial Brady claims in the case require a reversal of the petitioner’s conviction. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 7:38 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 11:51 am
Brady v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:12 pm
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:35 am
The New Orleans office has not had a storied history with the Court in its compliance with the Court’s 1963 decision in Brady v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:17 pm
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:21 pm
They are supposed to do that, under the Court’s 1963 decision in Brady v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:35 pm
Thompson begins at the link; more on Brady v. [read post]
