Search for: "Brennan v. CIR"
Results 81 - 100
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 2:51 pm
Another case that applies the rules is Brennan v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 9:54 am
Western Ag Enterprises (1986) 182 Cal.App.3d 546, 550–551 ["explicit agreement" for a fixed salary can comply with overtime laws]; Brennan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 11:10 pm
Brennan v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm
Cir. 1999), aff'd, 530 U.S. 27 (2000). [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:08 am
Grp., LLC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Brennan, No. 19-5885, ECF Nos. 17-18 (E.D. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 609 (1976) (Brennan, J., concurring) ("[I]t is the hypothesis of the First Amendment that injury is inflicted on our society when we stifle the immediacy of speech. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
See id. at 105-17; for Fourth Circuit cases so holding, see Brennan v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 4:54 pm
Harry Macklowe Real Estate Co., 6 F.3d 898, 904-05 (2d Cir. 1993). [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
App'x 48, 52 (2d Cir.2016); see also Roe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 9:19 am
Bibby v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 12:15 pm
Co., 328 F.2d 949, 951 (7th Cir. 1964); Advanced SemiconductorMaterials Am., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 6:25 am
Johnson, 902 F.3d 572 (6th Cir. 2018)); and Ohio (Ohio A. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:34 pm
Cir.1970) 439 F.2d 477, 480-481; Scott v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:03 am
Plaintiffs rely heavily on the plurality opinion of Justice Brennan in Board of Ed. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 6:36 pm
Cir. 2005); Hildebrandt v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
That three-Justice opinion (written by Justice Brennan and joined by Justices Marshall and Stevens) stressed that the tax exemption was not a permissible accommodation of religion, because it "burdens nonbeneficiaries markedly"[14] "by increasing their tax bills by whatever amount is needed to offset the benefit bestowed on subscribers to religious publications. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 9:32 am
Hardy (7th Cir. 2019) (affirming dismissal based on plaintiff's willful disobedience of discovery rules); Secrease v. [read post]
