Search for: "Brooks v. Rogers"
Results 81 - 100
of 147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am
Robert Hannigan, Former Director, United Kingdom Government Communications HeadquartersMike Rogers, Commander, US Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency Moderator: David Ignatius, Associate Editor and Columnist, The Washington Post That Was ThenMichael Collins, Deputy Assistant Director, East Asia Mission Center, Central Intelligence AgencyBonnie Glaser, Senior Advisor for Asia; Director, China Power Project, Center for Strategic and International StudiesKenichiro… [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am
Brooks Brothers, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 5:32 am
Circuit's decision Friday in Meshal v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
Brookings scholar Ken Lieberthal is quoted in this BBC News story about the upcoming discussions. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:03 am
Charles, Western Springs, Hinsdale, Cicero, Joliet, Waukegan, Aurora and Willow Brook, Ill. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Christopher Meyer looks at the impact of last Term’s decision in Baker Botts v. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 3:25 am
The workshop featured Brad Cantwell, Roger Bernstein, David Cover and Steve Brooks and included three case studies. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design… [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm
Brooks Brothers (IP Whiteboard) US Copyright New Copyright Tribunal Chairman (1709 Blog) The top 4 mistakes about copyright the MSM makes (PlagiarismToday) Open season on copyright infringement claims? [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
SAS Inst. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:03 pm
Senator Roger Marshall and Rep. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 11:14 am
Sentencing Guidelines to Justify Limiting the Impact of Johnson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
https://t.co/k2wjCVWDWj -> Oracle v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
” In holding that Domestic Relations Law § 70 “permits a non-biological, non-adoptive parent to achieve standing to petition for custody and visitation” (Brooke S.B., 28 NY3d at 27), the Court of Appeals stressed that it “has gone to great lengths to escape the inequitable results dictated by a needlessly narrow interpretation of the term ‘parent’ ” (Brooke S.B. at 24). [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Fisons Corp., 858 P.2d 1054, 1061 (Wash. 1993); Rogers v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:02 pm
New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Duthie, Roger, ed. 2012. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, for example, recently ruled in the Epic v. [read post]
