Search for: "Brown v. Board of State Fair Managers" Results 81 - 100 of 172
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Noting that “[p]roject applicants are encouraged to develop comprehensive transportation management plans” (citing City of Hayward v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
Monday’s argument agenda also included State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
In vetoing AB 1017, Governor Brown stated that we should wait to see whether last year’s momentous Fair Pay Act, SB 358, addressed the pay equity issue before making further changes. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
  Instead, the 2012 MOU was akin to the “term sheet” in Cedar Fair, L.P. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 12:15 am
 | Justice Slade delivers judgement in Arthur J Gallagher Services v Skriptchenko Never too late 99 [week ending on Sunday 5 June] German Constitutional Court sends sampling saga into another loop | Who should pay for the independence of the Boards of Appeal? [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 3:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
As to traffic impacts, there was no “fair argument” from the court’s perspective. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
HOLLAND, Appellee On Appeal from the 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2012-41959 Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 1:21 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  (Citing State Water Resources Control Board Cases (2006) 136 Cal.App.4th 674, 749-750 for the proposition that “CEQA does not exempt appellants from [the] ordinary rule that [a] substantial evidence argument is forfeited by failing to cite all material evidence on the subject” and quoting Boeken v. [read post]