Search for: "Brown v. Director of Revenue" Results 81 - 100 of 107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am by Blog Editorial
The Legal Representative of Succession Paul de Maroussem v The Director-General, Mauritius Revenue Authority, heard 8 June 2011. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition of Humane Society of America et al.Brief in opposition of Edmund Brown et al.Petitioner's supplemental briefAmicus brief of the American Association of Swine Veterinarians et al.Petitioner's reply CVSG Information:Invited: January 18, 2011Filed: May 26, 2011 (Deny) Title: Brown v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:09 am by Peter Rost
Rost was a Vice President, Marketing and Managing Director for Wyeth, responsible for the Nordic region in Europe.Dr. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
The Legal Representative of Succession Paul de Maroussem v The Director-General, Mauritius Revenue Authority, heard 8 June 2011. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm by Blog Editorial
The Legal Representative of Succession Paul de Maroussem v The Director-General, Mauritius Revenue Authority, heard 8 June 2011. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:51 am by Peter Rost
Rost was a Vice President, Marketing and Managing Director for Wyeth, responsible for the Nordic region in Europe.Dr. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:26 am by PJ Blount
The first, S.B. 1447, states: SENATE BILL NO. 1447 AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the Senate Committee on Finance on February 2, 2011) (Patron Prior to Substitute–Senator Wampler) A BILL to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 10 of Chapter 3 of Title 58.1 a section numbered 58.1-423, relating to tax revenues generated by commercial spaceflight; Virginia Commercial Space Flight Authority. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:26 am
All other funds held by the agencies and all future agency tax increment revenues would be diverted to other governmental uses. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:45 am by Nathaniel Grow
As a result, because consumers have not themselves been harmed, the BCS argues that it does not violate federal antitrust law.This defense draws on a line of antitrust precedent dating back to the Supreme Court's 1962 decision in Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:13 pm by Mike
Several Northern California Courts have recently ruled in Securities cases, among them: Brown v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:05 am by Andrew Voth
Drew Voth, Director at Grant Thornton LLP, is a Certified Public Accounta [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 8:43 am by Peter Rost
Rost was a Vice President, Marketing and Managing Director for Wyeth, responsible for the Nordic region in Europe.Dr. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
My thought: pursue the misuse arguments Posner offered in Ty v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
            The Scope of Liability             In the Illinois Supreme Court case, Karas v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law)   United States US General David Kappos confirmed as USPTO Director (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
His reasoning laid the foundation for the historic 1954 Brown v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
This post concludes and summarizes our coverage of the case United States v. [read post]