Search for: "Burns v. United States et al"
Results 81 - 100
of 128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
: the failure of safe drinking waterenforcement in the United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm
Not fair to characterize this as burn-Wall-Street. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:48 am
KF 1448.5 J64 2011 Minority shareholders : law, practice and procedure Victor Joffe … [et al.]. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:02 am
Earlier this year, the Irwig et al. study confirmed (“Persistent Sexual Side Effects of Finasteride for Male Pattern Hair Loss“) what the Traish et al. study (“Adverse side effects of 5? [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 11:42 am
Fessinger, Melanie B., et al. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:12 pm
That's certainly true at the Supreme Court.The case is United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:21 am
l al-fiqh / by Ihsan Abdul-Wajid Bagby. 1986 v, 244 leaves ; 28 cm. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
., Furby et al., 1989; Harris, Rice, & Quinsey, 1998; Polizzi, MacKenzie, & Hickman, 1999). [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) when the state is acting on its own behalf and exercising its discretion in deciding to pursue licensing for a hydroelectric dam project? [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
Int’l L. 457-550 (2010).Carrico, Amanda R., et al. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:28 am
(IPKat) United States US General The USTR Special 301 Report released: some initial reactions (TechnoLlama) (Knowledge Ecology International) (Public Knowledge) (Michael Geist) (Public Knowledge) (Patent Docs) Protective orders put at risk by new bill – Sunshine in Litigation Act (Patent Docs) US Patents Making the patenting process faster (Patenthink) USPTO official ‘optimistic’ that Green Patent Fast Track will be extended again (Green Patent Blog) US Patents… [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:01 am
Supermarkets, Inc. (29-CA-26862, et al.; 349 NLRB No. 6) Brooklyn, NY Jan. 19, 2007. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
After losing before the New Jersey Supreme Court, Princeton appealed to the United States Supreme Court with an absurd argument that their institutional First Amendment rights were violated by requiring that it allow people like my client on campus. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:16 pm
He pointed to the very liberal approach taken by the US Supreme Court to controversial messages, as exemplified in its recent decision in Snyder v Phelps et al 562 U.S. (2011) (a case concerning homophobic picketing outside military funerals by a church group who wanted to communicate their belief that God hated the US for its tolerance of homosexuality in the American military). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
District Court in TikTok Inc. et al. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
At every level of government in the United States (and often in other countries), there are laws that empower the public to file requests for public records. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
One of the most contentious and complicated emerging issues of corporate law in the United States is the issue of attorney client privilege when it is asserted by an entity. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
BP PLC et al., further separating climate litigation cases from the federal court system by holding that the nuisance claims in climate litigation shall be heard in state courts and not federal. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 1:02 pm
See in this regard our 2003 posting at Attorney Advertising in the USA and the Bates Case and our 2004 posting at Money to Burn - Judge Zagel, Robins et al., M. [read post]
