Search for: "Burrows v. Burrows" Results 81 - 100 of 312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2021, 4:55 am by CMS
These principles (as approved and slightly amended by Blindley Heath Investments Ltd & Anor v Bass [2015] EWCA Civ 1023 (“Blindley Heath”)) were referred to in Lord Burrows’ Supreme Court judgment: It is not enough that the common assumption is merely understood by the parties in the same way. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 2:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Burrows agrees with Lord Hodge that the appeal should be dismissed but disagrees on what is meant by illegitimate threats in relation to economic duress. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Issue 2, the majority, Lady Arden, Lord Leggatt and Lord Burrows, allows the appeal with Lord Sales and Lord Hodge dissenting. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The majority of the Court (Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lady Arden and Lord Burrows) allow Libya’s appeal on the first issue. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 3:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint, finding that these allegations, even if proven, would not entitle the plaintiff to relief pursuant to Judiciary Law § 487 (see Sammy v Haupel, 170 AD3d at 1225-1226; Seldon v Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, 116 AD3d 490, 491 [2014]; Schiller v Bender, Burrows &… [read post]
In a nod to LGBTQ+ Pride Month and the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 11:59 am by Brett Holubeck and Courtney Turkington
In a nod to LGBTQ+ Pride Month and the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 11:59 am by Courtney Turkington and Brett Holubeck
In a nod to LGBTQ+ Pride Month and the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 11:59 am by Brett Holubeck and Courtney Turkington
In a nod to LGBTQ+ Pride Month and the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 2:58 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Burrows emphasises that the purpose of the advice or information is of central importance. [read post]
25 May 2021, 9:31 am
 (See in English below)Estimadxs colegas,Con gran entusiasmo queremos compartirles la publicación del número 18 de Revista Derechos en Acción (ReDeA), dedicado especialmente a analizar los vínculos entre el accionar del FMI y los derechos humanos. [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:14 am by CMS
The appeal was heard on 8 February 2021 before Lord Reed, Lord Briggs, Lord Hamblen, Lord Leggatt and Lord Burrows. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
On 28 and 29 April 2021, the Supreme Court (Lord Reed, Lady Arden, Lords Sales, Leggatt and Burrows) heard the Google appeal against the Court of Appeal’s 2 October 2019 decision ([2019] EWCA Civ 1599). [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am by CMS
  In an early question from the bench, Lord Burrows queried what was meant by the “lowest common denominator”. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
A panel made up of Lord Reed, Lady Arden and Lords Sales, Leggatt and Burrows will decide whether, following the decision in Merricks v MasterCard [2020] UKSC 51, the winds of group litigation continue to blow in a pro-consumer direction. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:43 am by CMS
On 25 February 2021, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal in Anwar v The Advocate General (Representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy). [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:31 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Sales and Lord Burrows gave the sole judgment, with which the other members of the Court agreed. [read post]