Search for: "Butterworth v. Butterworth"
Results 81 - 100
of 137
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2009, 12:47 am
Here's a little curio, courtesy of the LexisNexis Butterworths Update service: it's Pocket Kings Ltd v Safenames Ltd and another [2009] EWHC 2529 (Ch), a 16 October 2009 decision of Michael Furness QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, England and Wales. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 2:13 pm
(London: Butterworths, 1953), vol. 3, at 69, and to what was said by Finch C.J.B.C. in Brophy v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 9:04 am
[57] In Barker v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:28 am
V. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 2:10 pm
(London: Butterworth, 1923) at p. 346. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 1:18 am
Butterworth, 701 So. 2d 76 (Fla.1997); Johnston v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 6:07 pm
The IPKat is bursting to read this in full on BAILII, since this posting-- based on a LexisNexis Butterworth note -- has stimulated his appetite to know more. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Butterworth, 701 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 1997); Johnston v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 3:48 pm
Lightbourne v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 11:29 am
In Zipher Ltd v Markem Systems Ltd and another [2008] EWHC 2078 (Pat), not yet available on BAILII but noted with extreme brevity by LexisNexis Butterworth's subscription service, Mr Justice Floyd has returned to an issue that is mentioned in his earlier decision in June -- the necessity (or otherwise) of Markem being given injunctive relief in respect of an undertaking which, Zipher had argued, was not really an undertaking not to amend one of its patents but a mere… [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 5:20 pm
Minimax GMBH & Co v Chubb Fire Ltd, a Chancery Division decision from England and Wales, was handed down yesterday by Mr Justice Floyd. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 4:35 pm
Everything you ever need to know about the IJLIT here.In stark contrast to IJLIT's blinding white is the gleaming black of Butterworths' Intellectual Property & Technology Cases law reports. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Another decision that slipped by last week was the ruling of Mr Justice Mann (Patents Court, England and Wales) in Matshusita Electric Industrial Company Ltd and others v UK Intellectual Property Office, a decision that has so far only made the columns of the subscription-only LexisNexis Butterworths service.Matsushita owned four patents for which no renewal fees were paid on the due date (9 December 2005). [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
Butterworth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:07 pm
Apple of His Eye, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
US v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Butterworth, 756 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2000)...................................................................................................17 Asay v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Butterworth, 756 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2000)...................................................................................................17 Asay v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 5:46 am
See Diaz v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:42 am
SC06-2391 v. [read post]
