Search for: "C and H Solutions, LLC"
Results 81 - 100
of 105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
Techniche Solutions, 419 F.3d 1374, 1379 (Fed. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
§ 355(j)(2)(A)(iii), (j)(2)(C). [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Ranbaxy and AstraZeneca reach agreement in Esomeprazole patent litigation: (SmartBrief), (IPBiz), (Spicy IP), (Profitability through Simplicity), (IP Law360), (Philip Brooks), (GenericsWeb), Cadbury loses Australian battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law… [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:00 am
TRANSCRIPT This is Michael H. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:22 pm
According to DOJ’s press release: The Department of Justice obtained more than $3.5 billion in settlements and judgments from civil cases involving fraud and false claims against the government in the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Benjamin C. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
Beech Ridge Energy LLC, 675 F. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
Navarro, April 2, 2018, Thomas, C.). [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
It is a method by which inventive solutions to practical problems are coaxed into the public domain by the promise of a limited monopoly for a limited time. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 12:59 pm
Alvarez, managing principal at BridgeCounsel Strategies LLC. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
And yet it may well be that Justice Ginsberg points to the obvious solution in this current age of Judicial interpretive proclivities--Congress may well have to legislate its own interpretation it if means to keep a greater control over the meaning that it, rather than the Courts, sought to make.6. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
By Richard T. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 9:25 am
Benjamin Caballero, a professor at the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said he does not think any "healthy person with a healthy diet" should take dietary supplements, with a few exceptions: "pregnant woman; children under the age of 6 months who are being breast-fed, as breast milk is not rich in vitamins A, C, and D; and people with gastrointestinal problems. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 9:25 am
Benjamin Caballero, a professor at the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said he does not think any "healthy person with a healthy diet" should take dietary supplements, with a few exceptions: "pregnant woman; children under the age of 6 months who are being breast-fed, as breast milk is not rich in vitamins A, C, and D; and people with gastrointestinal problems. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: (IP Down Under), (Spicy IP), (Ars Technica), (Patent Baristas), Clash over World Customs Organisation efforts on IP enforcement: (Intellectual Property Watch), Economics before legal solutions: (Dilanchian), Who is the best person to lead WIPO? [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
”[4] The Supreme Court once reversed him for reading an “unwritten exception” into a law he didn’t like, because “[h]owever sensible” his dislike of it might have been, a “court’s task is to apply the text [of a statute], not to improve upon it. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
[C.] [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
– EPA News Release, August 11, 2010 International Minerals Technology, LLC, of The Woodlands, Texas, has agreed to pay a $30,000 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the federal Clean Water Act at its Tetra Micronutrients production facility in Fairbury, Neb. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:56 pm
The Department’s solution is to amend “the initial tax rate for construction employers to be the greater of the initial rate for non-construction employers or the average rate for construction industry employers as determined by the department on each computation date, rounded up tothe next highest rate. [read post]
