Search for: "C. Smith" Results 81 - 100 of 5,764
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
Posted by Kris Pederson, Barton Edgerton, and Jamie Smith (EY), on Thursday, February 15, 2024 Editor's Note: Kris Pederson is Center for Board Matters Leader, Barton Edgerton is Center for Board Matters Corporate Governance Research Leader, and Jamie Smith is Center for Board Matters Investor Outreach and Corporate Governance Director at EY Americas. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
A contextual example of Appellant's reliance on fictitious authority includes: For instance, in Smith v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 4:20 am by Tom Kosakowski
Mason Smith, Ombuds, University of the BahamasJulie A. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
(Blackman was at the Heritage Foundation on Wednesday for a panel and on C-SPAN early this morning.) [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
If A conspires with B who conspires with C, all are linked in one conspiracy—even if A does not even know that C exists (and vice versa) and even if their specific plans diverge in many details.[23] (This is why the Amar brief repeatedly speaks of, for example, "Floyd and other top officials" and "Floyd and his allies. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 12:45 pm by admin
The same working group that agreed, on a divided vote, to place crystalline silica in Group 1, voted that “[c]oal dust cannot be classified as to its carcinogenicity to humans (Group 3). [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
In October 2018, the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) asked us to revise Rule 202.5(c) to read as follows: The Commission has adopted the policy that in any civil lawsuit brought by it or in any administrative proceeding of an accusatory nature pending before it, a defendant or respondent may consent to a judgment or order in which he admits, denies, or states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings.[7] I agree with the petitioner that… [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 8:35 pm by Ryan Snyder
In November 2022, Special Counsel Jack Smith was appointed to investigate President Trump’s efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. [read post]
Reed Smith will continue to follow developments related to this RFI and the future rulemaking that follows. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm by Dennis Crouch
  “[C]ourts may take it as given that Congress has legislated with the expectation that the principle of issue preclusion will apply [in the administrative context] except when a statutory purpose to the contrary is evident. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
In advance of the International Court of Justice’s ruling on Friday, we asked several leading experts if they would provide us with their views on the judicial order once it was issued. [read post]