Search for: "C. Nash" Results 81 - 100 of 198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2016, 1:59 pm
P. 15(c), a claim relates back to the original pleading when it arises out of the conduct set forth in the original pleading. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:00 pm by Cary Coglianese
The reason for concern is not just because, as many commentators have observed in recent weeks, individual nations’ emissions reduction pledges do not add up to what is needed to avoid the 2 °C global temperature threshold. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 6:51 am by Ron Friedmann
DiDomenico, Director of Knowledge Management, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:59 am by Dennis Crouch
 Thinking proportionally again, Benoit then estimated that $0.56 of every $2.93 in revenue was profit for Samsung and that – based upon a Nash Bargaining Solution, that a reasonable royalty would split that profit – or $.28 per phone in license fees. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
More legal history is found in a review of Licensed to Practice: The Supreme Court Defines the American Medical Profession by James C. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:05 pm by Michael K. Grife, Esq.
The Plaintiffs relied on Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442(c)(3) which requires that a joint proposal shall state the amount and terms attributable to each party. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:05 pm by Michael K. Grife, Esq.
The Plaintiffs relied on Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442(c)(3) which requires that a joint proposal shall state the amount and terms attributable to each party. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:05 pm by Michael K. Grife, Esq.
The Plaintiffs relied on Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442(c)(3) which requires that a joint proposal shall state the amount and terms attributable to each party. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:05 pm by Michael K. Grife, Esq.
The Plaintiffs relied on Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442(c)(3) which requires that a joint proposal shall state the amount and terms attributable to each party. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
| Plant variety in Case C‑242/14 | US Supreme Court on Spiderman patent | Hospira v Genentech saga | Are EU policy-makers fighting the right copyright battles? [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
| Plant variety in Case C‑242/14 | US Supreme Court on Spiderman patent | Hospira v Genentech saga | Are EU policy-makers fighting the right copyright battles? [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| Plant variety in Case C‑242/14 | US Supreme Court on Spiderman patent | Hospira v Genentech saga | Are EU policy-makers fighting the right copyright battles? [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| Plant variety in Case C‑242/14 | US Supreme Court on spiderman patent | Hospira v Genentech saga | Are EU policy-makers fighting the right copyright battles? [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
The black cabs are those examined by Richard Spearman QC (sitting as a deputy Judge of the Chancery Division, England and Wales) in The London Taxi Corporation Ltd v Frazer-Nash Research Ltd & Ecotive Ltd [2015] EWHC 1840 (Ch), a curious tale of taxi look-alikes and bizarre surveys. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 9:57 pm by José Manuel Gómez Porchini
Si tú confiesas y tu cómplice no, tú sales libre y él se queda 12 años en la cárcel. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 8:33 pm by Melissa L. Greipp
Congratulations to 3Ls Xhenta Ademi, Tyler Nash, Frank Remington, and Patrick Winter for reaching the quarterfinals of the Philip C. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
Louis University Robert Chesney bobbychesney Texas Colleen Chien colleen_chien Santa Clara Luis Chiesa proflchiesa SUNY Buffalo Adam Chilton adamschilton Chicago Andrew Chin chinunc UNC Kenneth Ching kennyching Regent Cyra Akila Choudhury cyrachoudhury Florida International Allison Christians taxpolblog McGill Chester Chuang ChesterChuang Golden Gate Danielle Citron daniellecitron Maryland Bradford Clark profbradclark George Washington Sherman Clark shermanjclark Michigan Brian Clarke… [read post]