Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2013, 7:36 am
But since then, in 2011 the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 8:41 am
As California wage and hour lawyers we read with interest the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Christopher v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 10:25 am
In 2019, the California legislature enacted AB 5 to codify the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex West Operations, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 6:36 am
Padilla, Case No. 19STCV27561, that California’s statute requiring California-based public companies to have one to three women on their boards of directors (S.B. 826), depending on their board size, violated the equal protection clause of the state constitution. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:04 am
v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:39 pm
This uptick has not only heightened the legal and financial pressures on companies across various industries but also raised questions about the broader implications for the state’s business environment. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 3:53 pm
Supreme Court acknowledged in Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 3:21 pm
The case, In re Monarch Consulting, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:01 pm
On May 13, 2022, a judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled in Crest v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:40 am
A federal district court in California approved a $15.8 million settlement of the class action between Matco and a class of 273 franchisee distributors. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:11 am
” The court harkened back to the California case Edwards v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:47 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed a California district court’s preliminary injunction barring the state from enforcing AB5 and its ABC test for IC status against any motor carrier doing business in California. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 3:09 am
People v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:44 am
The complaint names as defendants the California Department of Industrial Relations as well as the state attorney, and seeks to a nullification of the state supreme court’s ruling that (they say) effectively “eliminates the use of owner-operators, even on-truck motor carriers,” from the trucking industry. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 10:45 am
Court’s Analysis The court stated that the “pivotal inquiry looks at the ‘control of details’ – i.e., whether the [company] has ‘the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:37 pm
On July 7, 2017, the California Supreme Court filed its 69-page opinion, written by Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and joined by five other justices, in Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:37 pm
On July 7, 2017, the California Supreme Court filed its 69-page opinion, written by Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and joined by five other justices, in Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 7:34 am
This case was heard before Court of Appeal for the State of California Second Appellate Division. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
American International Industries v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 7:45 am
Written as a means of codifying the California Supreme Court’s 2018 ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
