Search for: "CARTER v. CHARLES" Results 81 - 100 of 132
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2012, 8:46 am by Lawrence Solum
Butler (1936); and before both Hughes and Roberts voted to invalidate provisions of the Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935 in Carter v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:30 am by Dan Ernst
Butler (1936); and before both Hughes and Roberts voted to invalidate provisions of the Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935 in Carter v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:58 am by Kiran Bhat
Court for the Northern Dist. of Texas and Davis v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:05 am
Appx. 99 In 1991 Charles Carter filed a complaint with the New York State Division of Human Rights (SDHR) that alleged racial discrimination in employment. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am by INFORRM
The Index on Censorship blog has a piece by Richard Wilson about the case of McLaughlin v LB Lambeth (see our case comment on an interlocutory decision last year)  asking the question: why would a London primary school employ the services of a political lobbying firm — and libel lawyers Carter Ruck? [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:47 am by Lovechilde
  Charles Hamilton Houston, Thurgood Marshall, Robert Carter, Constance Baker Motley, Jack Greenberg, and others litigated all around the country in their efforts to take down Plessy v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Shergill v Purewal [2010] EWHC 3610 (QB) – 15 Dec 2010. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:36 am by Gary Nitzkin
Charles Lincoln’s third amended complaint to Santa Anna USDC judge David O Carter. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:29 am by Justin Walsh
This could be, quite simply, whether they do proper citation format (Justice Charles Johnson gets an exemption from this, as I know his take on the bluebook, why, and the running mandate to his clerks). [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 11:29 am
After suffering an injury from the hole, Carter was transported to Women's and Children's Hospital in Lake Charles. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Although the “folk belief” is that trial by jury is less favourable to the defendant, a number of the recent applications for trials by judge alone (Gregson, Charman v Orion 17 June 2005;  Prince Radu of Hohenzollern v Houston [2007] EWHC 2328 (QB), Gentoo v Hanratty ([2008] EWHC 2328 (QB)) have been made by claimants. [read post]