Search for: "CH Holding Company" Results 81 - 100 of 1,227
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[17] The Court pointed to language in Corwin itself, limiting its holding to post-closing damages claims, as reiterated by the Delaware Supreme Court in Morrison v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Ch. 1979), which invalidated the use of blank check preferred stock to alter the voting rights of an existing shareholder. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:36 am by Peter J. Sluka
  The Court did not bite, holding that “Plaintiff has not carried her burden of proving, for purposes of a summary judgment motion, that the Court should disregard the minority and lack of marketability discounts employed by Defendant’s expert. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Ch. 2016), which helped drive the increase in merger-objection filings between 2015 and 2017. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
On Friday 17 March 2023, judgment on costs was handed down by Friedman J in Musst Holdings Ltd v Astra Asset Management UK Ltd & Anor (Re Costs) [2023] EWHC 595 (Ch). [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
” [3] The current claim before the English High Court is the first known attempt to hold a company’s directors personally liable for allegedly failing to properly manage climate risk and to prepare the company for the energy transition. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:33 am by Peter J. Sluka
., 73 A3d 934 [Del Ch 2013], and ATP Tour, Inc. v Deutscher Tennis Bund, 91 A3d 554 [Del 2014]. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am by admin
”                     Samuel Butler, Erewhon Revisited, ch. 14   It has been a while since I have written about the scientist defamation case of brought by climate scientist and advocate, Michael E. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
Nestle v Cadbury [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch) (July 2022)You can’t trade mark a colour. [read post]