Search for: "CITY OF BOERNE"
Results 81 - 100
of 187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2020, 9:44 am
City of Boerne v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 9:44 am
City of Boerne v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 10:40 am
One of the key questions at stake is whether Section 5 imposes a heavy burden on the states (an important step in evaluating whether Section 5 is “congruent and proportional,” to use the City of Boerne v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Second, the federal RFRA is unconstitutional when applied to state law under Boerne v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Virginia (1996), City of Boerne v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Virginia (1996), City of Boerne v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
City of Hialeah.) [read post]
Third Circuit Upholds Philadelphia Police's Ban On Headscarves Without A Word On The First Amendment
9 Apr 2009, 8:34 am
Shortly thereafter, the Supreme Court in City of Boerne v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am
When Congress makes a dubious claim that it is motivated by a desire to effectuate the Constitution's ban on slavery, the applicable standard is the "congruence and proportionality" test of City of Boerne v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 1:58 pm
The same goes for review of state and local legislation; there you have to talk about the possibility of congressional legislation to preempt bad stuff – freed of the constraint of City of Boerne v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
My article responds that (1) If the Obama Department of Education was right about the proper interpretation of those regulations, then, by analogy to City of Boerne v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 4:21 pm
If this particular result is problematic under modern cases like City [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am
Four years later, it was held unconstitutional in City of Boerne v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:19 am
In a 1997 decision, in the case of City of Boerne v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 10:23 pm
Florida), and the Act could not be sustained as legislation validly enacted pursuant to § 5 under the test set forth in City of Boerne v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:24 am
Modern decisions beginning with City of Boerne v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:26 pm
No dice as to the States, said the Supreme Court in City of Boerne v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 9:15 am
Frost (Art Lien) The modern history of state attorneys arguing as amicus curiae in the Supreme Court began with then-Ohio State Solicitor Jeffrey Sutton’s 1997 argument in City of Boerne v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 5:00 pm
Although the Supreme Court struck down RFRA as applied to state and local governments in City of Boerne v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:00 pm
But in City of Boerne (1997), the Supreme Court found RFRA to be unconstitutional because it exceeded Congress’s power under the Enforcement Clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. [read post]
