Search for: "COHAN"
Results 81 - 100
of 307
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2014, 7:38 am
” In the end, the reviewer concludes, neither Cohan nor Nifong are able to provide any “new perspective” on the case.Again: all of this comes from a paper that twice endorsed Nifong and whose editorial slant seems highly sympathetic to Cohan overall.I suppose Cohan can hold out hope for a positive review from the Herald-Sun? [read post]
4 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Cohan as “the conscience of progressive thinkers in North Carolina. [read post]
3 May 2014, 11:33 am
Cohan reveals a new round in the media's rush to judgment about the case. [read post]
2 May 2014, 6:35 am
Cohan has ratcheted up his wild claims and misleading innuendoes during at least 10 broadcast and print interviews about the book, even, in some cases, after proof of their falsity had been published by us and others. [read post]
1 May 2014, 10:07 pm
[Again, Cohan brushes past the Darryl Howard case.] [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
”Nifong references in the index (presumably prepared by Cohan or under Cohan’s direction) do not substantiate Cohan’s claim. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Cohan) paid “$100 million” [sic] for a “frat party. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 11:32 am
Cohan floundered in response. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
COHAN: . . . [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 8:34 am
Cohan's work. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
”Cohan has never acknowledged the error. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Cohan’s book tour has featured a full-throated defense of prosecutorial misconduct. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Cohan would have looked like. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
So if Cohan had actually criticized the Wilson piece “in particular,” he would have effectively undermined his own book’s argument.Of course, Cohan had made no such criticism, much less “in particular. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Cohan opts for an apology for Nifong and, by extension, prosecutors who hide evidence and lie to judges. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Cohan has never contacted me. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
” (Is Cohan so blasé in upholding legal obligations in his own life?) [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:31 am
Along the way, Cohan repeatedly smears the falsely accused “Duke lax bros,” as he mockingly calls them on Twitter. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 5:32 am
Cohan produces no evidence that he pressed Steel on the issue. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 12:32 pm
Sensational smears based on false information aside, the absence of new evidence does not deter Cohan from seeking to spin his own tendentious characterizations of old evidence—often contradicted by other evidence elsewhere in the book—into dark Nifongesque innuendos of sexual assault, or "something." [read post]
