Search for: "CONSUMER ECONOMIC LOSS PLAINTIFFS" Results 81 - 100 of 941
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2024, 10:58 am by Christopher G. Hill
Did the economic loss rule bar the VCPA and fraud claims? [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:05 am by Christopher G. Hill
Did the economic loss rule bar the VCPA and fraud claims? [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 1:00 am by Russell Jackson
  But the court held that "[plaintiff] cannot separate out his claims from the purview of the OPLA simply by claiming only economic losses. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:39 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Plaintiffs have to show the loss of money or other property, and loss of PII and related economic loss is insufficient. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 2:28 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Non-economic damages, also referred to as general damages, are damages that do not have a fixed value, such as pain and suffering, loss of consortium, and mental anguish. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 11:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
And as a practical matter, wouldn’t the deployment of these tools introduce a potentially cumbersome, evidentiary-based process at the class certification stage that could be ungainly, time-consuming and costly? [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by Steve McConnell
There is no obvious, quantifiable pecuniary loss that Plaintiff incurred from purchasing a drug that worked for him and did not cause him any harm" Id. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:48 am by Sean Mirski, Shira Anderson
Class Action: The plaintiffs purport to represent a whopping 13 national classes and their accompanying Florida subclasses: (1) a noncommercial tort class made up of “[a]ll persons and legal entities in the United States who have suffered personal injury, including emotional distress, and/or property damage, and other loss related to the outbreak of the COVID-19 virus”; (2) a commercial class made up of “[a]ll persons and legal entities … who have suffered… [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 8:34 am by Hirsch & Lyon
Contact a Qualified Phoenix Accident Attorney for Guidance on Your Claims In Arizona, and all other states, injured plaintiffs may assert damages for the economic losses they sustain to their vehicle. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm by Maria Hook
The Court held that local consumer legislation – in the form of the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (CGA) – applies to foreign manufacturers. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:17 pm by Bexis
A named plaintiff must allege facts showing that he or she personally suffered economic loss as a result of an inadequate recall to state a cognizable injury.Id. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:17 pm by Bexis
A named plaintiff must allege facts showing that he or she personally suffered economic loss as a result of an inadequate recall to state a cognizable injury.Id. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 3:14 am
The jurors are in the best position to truly determine the plaintiff's loss. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 6:32 pm by Sarah Cool
Plaintiffs can also include claims and receive damages for loss of a loved one, sometimes called loss of consortium. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:36 pm by David M. McLain
The economic loss rule does not bar recovery for damages based on pre-contractual fraud where the fraud induced a plaintiff to enter the contract, as discussed in Van Rees v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 2:01 pm by Beck, et al.
Medtronic moved to dismiss plaintiff's state-law claims, which sounded in - you guessed it - consumer fraud, misrepresentation, warranty, and subrogation. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 5:43 pm by Sean Wajert
And any certification decision in a class action regarding personal injury or economic loss must include a determination, based on a rigorous analysis of the evidence presented, that the requirement was satisfied. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 12:09 pm by ricelawmd_3p2zve
Personal injury claims are made up of two types of damages; economic losses and non-economic losses. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 However, the economic loss doctrine precluded recovery; plaintiffs didn’t allege a “special relationship” with Sony beyond those envisioned in everyday consumer transactions, so they couldn’t avoid the economic loss doctrine.As for negligent misrepresentation/innocent misrepresentation/negligent omission claims, they went down for various reasons (e.g., negligent misrepresentation is not available in Ohio for… [read post]