Search for: "CORNELL V. STATE"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,516
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am
This post is by Maggie Gardner, a professor of law at Cornell Law School. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:52 am
* [i] There have been more than 230 corporate bankruptcy filings in the United States in 2023, according to the latest market intelligence data from S&P Global. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:52 am
* [i] There have been more than 230 corporate bankruptcy filings in the United States in 2023, according to the latest market intelligence data from S&P Global. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
It's based on amicus briefs that Michael Dorf (Cornell), Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern), and I filed in past cases (and that I blogged about before), but it elaborates somewhat further on that argument. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
United States, 445 U.S. 222, 227 n.8 (1980) (quoting Judge Learned Hand’s statement in Gratz v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
, Best v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
In Allen v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 10:30 am
Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:25 am
Moore v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:38 pm
We wrote a brief together in Elane Photography v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 7:00 am
Circuit’s exacting standard of review in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Last week, in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:30 am
Phelps in 2011, United States v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
(That essay also explains the math that we used to derive the 40,100 percent interest rate stated above.)Our overall bottom line does not change, however, because the fundamental objection to all of the gimmicks has less to do with the exact interaction of the words of the key statutes than it does with a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
3 May 2023, 3:58 am
Heller (2008)…and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
