Search for: "CORRIGAN V US"
Results 81 - 100
of 181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
Vacha v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 1:05 pm
Kreiner v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:12 am
This right "'must be scrupulously protected'"(People v Smith , 87 NY2d 715, 721 [1996], quoting People v Corrigan , 80 NY2d 326, 332 [1992]). [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:00 am
Justice Corrigan observed that you're reading something into it either way (i.e., either you assume that they thought Pioneer would not use their complaints for any other purpose, or you assume that they willingly shared their information with Pioneer thereby waiving any privacy right). [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 2:29 pm
But don’t feel bad for us. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:30 am
In People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Alden v Maine, 527 US 706, the Supreme Court of the United States found that State sovereign immunity is "implicit in the constitutional design. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 8:55 am
In Ward v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 7:00 pm
On July 21, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court in McNeil v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
Supreme Court held in Lefkowitz v Turley, 414 US 70, when a public employee is compelled to answer questions or face removal if he or she refuses to do so, the responses are cloaked with immunity automatically, and neither the compelled statements nor their fruits may be used against the employee in a subsequent criminal prosecution.Other decisions addressing the issue of requiring an individual to answer "job-related" question include Garner v… [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:34 pm
The Court’s unanimous opinion in O’Neil v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:46 pm
In People v. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 12:15 pm
A Golfer has No Duty to Protect Another Player From Ordinary NegligenceShin v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Gardner v Broderick, 392 US 273 and People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326 discuss the parameters of immunity in connection with compelling a public officer or employee to answer questions concerning his or her performance of official duties.If, however, an individual fails to answer questions truthfully where he or she has use or transactional immunity, such immunity does not prevent the fact that he or she answered falsely from being used against the… [read post]
24 May 2012, 2:44 pm
Corrigan of Lubing & Corrigan, LLC, Jackson, Wyoming; Mikel L. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:13 pm
In Michigan v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:34 am
And if there was any more irony to be found in Greenhouse’s double secret polemic, it’s in her use of the mean ol’ Fifth Circuit’s Buck v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:00 pm
United Air Lines (1999) 527 US 471. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 12:13 am
Michigan and Kurts v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 5:02 pm
In Van Horn v. [read post]
