Search for: "CROSS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,158
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2023, 2:57 pm
If signed by the Governor, this legislation would codify the 2008 California Supreme Court decision in Edwards v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 12:15 am
California's recently enacted SB 699 appears to cross this line as there can be no greater impairment of a contractual obligation than to declare a contract unenforceable. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am
He will be cross-examined tomorrow.Even entirely apart from Professor Yoo's reputational challenges, his substantive view is outlandish. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
The Governor of California must now decide whether or not to sign the bill into law. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
Every year after Labor Day, I take a step back to survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and insurance. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
In Boermeester v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
Christopher Anderson, et al. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
California, 489 U.S. 121, 129 (1989). [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:35 am
It is cross-posted at Transnational Litigation Blog. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am
Interpreter fees are addressed in California Code of Regulations, title 8, section 9795.3. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:34 am
Franklin v Hafftka, 140 AD3d 922, 924). [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 11:41 am
From today's press release, by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression:, about Palsgaard v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:52 pm
Sears v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 11:17 am
Mayorkas (Central District of California No. 22-01510). [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 9:33 am
In Edmond Carmona, et al v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm
P would need reasonable claim to comprehensiveness or representativeness, subject to cross-examination. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 1:58 pm
The right to actively cross-examine the complainant and principal witness against you:Critical in criminal cases.Not really important when a private university decides to expel you.So (unanimously) holds the California Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:28 am
DPF v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 1:27 pm
The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm
A federal judge in California blocked a Biden Administration rule that bars migrants who crossed into the United States from applying for asylum unless they entered the country at an official port of entry or obtained asylum protection in a different country. [read post]
