Search for: "California Employment Law Letter"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,013
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
Many employers will need to revise their pre-adverse and adverse action letters to comply with the many laws regulating criminal background checks, and to revamp the timing of events in their hiring process. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
News Methodology Penalizes Most California Law Schools, on TaxProf... [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:25 pm
Job Summary We are Renne Public Law Group (RPLG), named by the Daily Journal as one of the Top 20 Boutique Law Firms in California. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:45 am
It is common sense and a basic principle of fairness that if the California Labor Commissioner can interpret the California Labor Code for purposes of enforcing the law against an employer, then the Labor Commissioner should also be able to provide reliable advice to an employer regarding how to comply with the law. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 1:33 pm
This includes not only offer letters and employment contracts, but also severance and settlement agreements. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:23 am
On December 15, Mark Schickman and Cathleen Yonahara, editors of California Employment Law Letter and attorneys with Freeland, Cooper, and Foreman LLP, will explain what changes California employers should make to their handbooks for the new year. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 11:35 am
For more information on this topic, see “Governor signs bill granting domestic workers overtime pay” in the October 14, 2013, issue of California Employment Law Letter. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 2:00 am
Although I’m sure that employment law attorneys will have a keen interest in this new law, I’m mentioning it today because I see SB 459 as an example of a developing regulatory trend here in California – the use of website disclosure requirements to influence business behavior. [read post]
26 May 2022, 9:17 am
Continue Reading › The post Seeking Recourse for Employment Termination after a Long-Distance Transfer appeared first on California Employment Law Blog. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 2:24 pm
Second, California law allows for broad discovery of employee information from the outset of a PAGA case. [read post]
3 May 2019, 2:25 pm
In 2017, California passed multiple statutes that prohibit employers from considering expunged criminal records in hiring decisions. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 9:10 am
On September 15, 2023, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed a law that made dramatic changes to the enforceability of invention assignment provisions in employment agreements and likely in related agreements including offer letters and Confidentiality, Information and Invention Assignment Agreements (CIIAAs). [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
California employers, moreover, are required to “prominently display” in lettering larger than size 14 point type a list of employees’ rights and responsibilities under the whistleblower laws, including the telephone number of the whistleblower hotline. [read post]
9 May 2010, 8:55 am
A closely-divided California Supreme Court has dealt employment arbitrations a potentially huge setback. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 7:55 am
Furloughs may trigger final pay obligations, including payment of accrued vacation/paid time off Employers should keep in mind that under California law furloughs or temporary layoffs may trigger final pay obligations under the Labor Code. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 2:25 am
Doherty (University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law and University of California, Los Angeles - School of Law) have posted Do Antidiscrimination Regimes Discriminate? [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 12:02 pm
The post Costs of doing business in California appeared first on California Employment Law Report. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 11:21 am
About Renne Public Law Group We are Renne Public Law Group (RPLG), named by the Daily Journal as one of the Top 20 Boutique Law Firms in California. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 8:47 am
The post SSDI Award Letter Helps Client Win ERISA Case appeared first on McKennon Law Group. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:37 pm
The employer took the case to the California Supreme Court, who rightfully weighed in and made clear that such opinion letters are privileged and should not be subject to discovery. [read post]
