Search for: "California v. Austin" Results 81 - 100 of 634
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
The next day, in a shadow docket order in Austin v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Barry, Transgender Rights & the Eighth Amendment, (Southern California Law Review, Vol. 95, No. 109, 2021).Yvonne Lindgren, The Fathers’ Veto and Fatherhood As Property, (February 24, 2022).From SSRN (Non-U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 9:19 am
Openings without a nominee pending include three seats on the California-based U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 12:50 pm by Tom Kosakowski
Once elected, directors will serve a full term from April 2022 – April 2025 [Original emphasis and internal links to members-only pages omitted.]Here are the nominees along links to any information published on the Ombuds Blog:2021–2024 Director TermSuzanne Diviney, CO-OP, Vice President, Office of the Ombuds Lead, Pfizer Inc.Thomas Griffin, Ombudsperson, UCLA Health and Health Sciences, University of California, Los AngelesJennifer Mahony, Ombuds Office Director, Boston… [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
ExxonMobil is asking the Texas Supreme Court to allow it to use the law, known as rule 202, to pursue legal action against more than a dozen California municipal officials. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am by Aaron Rubin and Heather Whitney
” The law was set to go into effect on December 2, but on November 29, a federal district court in Austin heard oral arguments on its (un)constitutionality. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:03 pm by Henry Miller
Supreme Court heard arguments in Dobbs v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 9:03 pm by Eric Cervone
Supreme Court issued a ruling in the case of Biden v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"[26] This is connected to the argument of the Court's majority in Austin v. [read post]