Search for: "California v. Clark"
Results 81 - 100
of 643
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
California law guarantees lunch breaks for hourly workers in California. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:29 pm
Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450, 455-456 [decisions of the California Supreme Court are binding upon and must be followed by all the state courts of California].). [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:11 am
Clark? [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 11:16 am
Clark. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:26 am
In California v. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 9:30 pm
Kelso details the first decades of the iconic San Quentin Prison, and of the California Supreme Court’s key role in safeguarding the public’s interest by exercising necessary oversight of the Legislature and the governor.Also in this issue, David Ettinger notes the centennial of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Piper v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 1:42 pm
LEXIS 19844 (ND NY, Feb. 17, 2016), a New York federal district court allowed an inmate to move ahead with his complaint over delay in processing his request to change his religion from Protestant to Muslim.In Clark v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 8:03 am
Jim (Gaming Revenue Distributions; Taxation)California v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:24 pm
See State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 12:10 pm
In doing so, the Court declined to extend California v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:10 am
LEXIS 188322 (ND CA, Nov. 2, 2018), a California federal district court dismissed the complaint of an Orthodox Jewish former pre-trial detainee that he was not allowed to have candles and a particular prayer book or to wear his tallit katan outside his cell.In Clark v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 10:00 pm
The case is Wixen Music Publishing Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 9:51 am
Clarke, 2017 U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:16 pm
Clark (2011) 52 Cal.4th 856, on August 29. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 10:07 am
Clark v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 8:40 am
The court held that California courts could hear the case, applying California law. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 2:01 pm
§ 1983 challenging Section 647(b) of the California Penal Code, which criminalizes the commercial exchange of sexual activity.The panel first rejected plaintiffs' assertion that Lawrence v. [read post]
28 May 2017, 12:52 pm
Clark, 2017 U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Morgan Kousser, Emeritus, California Institute of Technology, have signed a Historians’ Amicus Brief in Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:58 am
Michigan Supreme Court should uphold his First Amendment rights [Clark Neily and Jay Schweikert on Cato Institute brief in Michigan v. [read post]
