Search for: "California v. Lord" Results 81 - 100 of 304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2014, 10:40 am
However, the ninth federal US circuit has extended the laches doctrine to bar both legal and equitable claims (see DANJAQ, LLC v Sony Corp., 263 F.3d 942, 962 (9th Cir. 2001)), while other federal circuits reject laches as a absolute defence to copyright legal claims: see Lyons P’ship LP v Morris Costumes Inc., 243 F.3d 789, 797 (4th Cir. 2001) and Chirco v Crosswinds Communities Inc., 474 F.3d 227, 234 (6th Cir. 2007). [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In a rare radio interview this week the President of the Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger, said that politicians were too slow to defend judges after November’s Brexit case. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:06 pm
Last month the California Supreme Court issued an opinion (Bourhis v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am by Stephen Sachs
My long-in-the-works article Finding Law has now been published online in the California Law Review. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 10:42 am by Dennis Crouch
It does not justify the implication of a term transferring ownership of the items: see Liverpool City Council v Irwin [1977] AC 239 at 245 (Lord Wilberforce) and compare Ray v Classic FM plc [1998] FSR 622 at 642-643 (Lightman J). [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am by INFORRM
Constitutional Affairs, Equalities, Home Affairs, Justice and Law – Lord McNally/Lord Taylor of Holbeach, Main Chamber, House of Lords.. [read post]