Search for: "Call v. McKenzie"
Results 81 - 100
of 129
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2012, 11:59 am
In McKenzie v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:55 am
While court users in England & Wales have been able to call upon the services of McKenzie Friends, Scotland took FORTY YEARS to allow McKenzie Friends to appear in the Court of Session, many contend due to resistance from the legal profession & worries clients may chose to litigate themselves instead of hiring expensive legal teams.An earlier report on the Tods Murray v Arakin case can be read HERE with coverage of the appeal, recently heard by the court… [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 11:39 am
As Lord Justice Clark, Lord Gill chaired a review commission that recommended McKenzie friends be granted rights of audience in the courts. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 9:51 am
When Mckenzie no-showed in response to this so-called "notice" (surprise, surprise), Karnaby sought a default judgment. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 11:40 am
Supreme Court will be hearing arguments in April, 2012 on this issue in another case, Christopher v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:07 am
Prior to joining the faculty at Missouri, Dr Strong was Counsel specializing in international dispute resolution at Baker & McKenzie LLP and a dual-qualified practitioner (U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Using funding from a Russian organisation called the Moscow Bureau for Human Rights, Mr Terluk found legal representation for his appeal. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:14 pm
Appearances For the appellant: Bruce McClintock SC and Richard Potter instructed by Baker & McKenzie. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 8:54 am
It was only in 1996, in the celebrated case Common Cause v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:40 pm
On Nov. 3, the 2nd Court ruled in Kathryn and Jeremy Medlen v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:02 am
For convenience I will call this the ultimate balancing test. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 7:06 am
Lord Woolman is the presiding judge in the present claim of M.Wilson v North Lanarkshire Council & Others (A1628/01). [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:34 am
To book your place, do get in touch with Lisa Pick by email or give her a call on +44 20 7242 2523. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:39 am
See Sgalambo v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 2:33 pm
Anna's case, or Stern v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
Tewari De-Ox Systems Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Gillooly[8] notes that Amendments 1 – 10 of the United States Constitution, commonly referred to as the Bill of Rights, stand at one end of the scale, while Australia stands at the other end (the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Canada being somewhere in the middle), and that the question is how human rights can be protected from what he calls “the tyranny of the majority”. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 9:48 am
It's Case T-437/09 Oyster Cosmetics SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Kadabell GmbH & Co. [read post]
