Search for: "Call v. Superior Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 4,338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2013, 10:04 am
A so-called 30A appeal was filed with the Superior Court under Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 30A, Section 14, and the judge there did not overturn the denial. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 3:00 am
One New Jersey Superior Court judge has decided that a child may decide whether to call a step-parent “Mom” or “Dad” or any derivative thereof. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 10:52 am
The recent case of Zaldivar v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:24 pm
We'll call that the "air space" test (for lack of a better term). [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:27 pm
(DMC No. 9914) (Maricopa County Superior Court No. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 8:19 am
In January 2012, the Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a decision in Bricklayers of Western Pennsylvania Combined Funds v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:59 am
Arbuckle, appealed his conviction after a trial de novo in the Superior Court, Law Division. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 8:06 am
Superior Court, the California Supreme Court held that “an employer must relieve an employee of all duty on a rest break and relinquish any control over how the employee spends his or her time. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:10 am
In People ex rel Becerra v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 10:28 pm
(DMC No.7139) (Yavapai County Superior Court No. 2006-0206995): Mr. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
Superior Court (2015) 233 Cal.App.4th 8, 13, 25 (Burdick); Walden v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:31 am
The trial court (Sacramento County Superior, Judge Steven H. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
Superior Court, 39 Cal.3d 740 (1985)). [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:44 pm
Meanwhile, Mother filed an appeal to the Superior Court on April 26. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 9:41 pm
By Viki LewinskiIn Jackson v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Superior Court, 53 Cal.4th 1004, 1039-40 (2012)). [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 2:45 pm
Superior Court ex rel Krescent, S199384 (Cal. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 11:45 am
" And, reading the Court of Appeal's opinion, you can totally see why. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Verba v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 1:43 pm
Yes, the statute broadly defines what I've called "stuff," and includes any "oral and written communications" made "for the purpose of, in the course of, or pursuant to, a mediation or a mediation consultation. [read post]
