Search for: "Campbell v. Sharpe" Results 81 - 97 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
In that context, it has been held that “the values enshrined in Articles 8 and 10 are now part of the cause of action for breach of confidence” (See Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 at [17] (Lord Nicholls) and that it is necessary to consider Strasbourg jurisprudence to establish the scope of that domestic cause of action, since those Articles are now “not merely of persuasive or parallel effect” but are “the very content of… [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Making an Effective Case Directly to the TV Networks Jennifer Santos, Vice President, Ad Standards, NBC History of network challenges: 1971, FTC started encouraging comparative advertising. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 3:35 am
The present application brings the constitutional imperative of the rule of law into sharp focus… The Applicants are wholly successful… See Environmental Defence Canada v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
  Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
  Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm by Jason Krebs
RETAIL CONSIGNEES FOR FSIS RECALL 034-2009 (EXPANDED) FSIS has reason to believe that the following retail location(s) received assorted beef products that have been recalled by JBS Swift Beef Company. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 7:41 am by Andrei Mincov
Recently I wrote a 100-page comparative research paper on the treatment of parody in the copyright laws of common law countries and selected European countries. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 8:05 am
NeemanCitation: 2009 WY 58Docket Number: S-08-0117Appeal from the District Court of Campbell County, the Honorable Dan. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
But a few of the things he talks about, one does feel qualified to comment on, and sometimes one finds himself in sharp disagreement.Oddly, some of the things Posner defends, at least in part, but that one disagrees with, are things that he is not guilty of. [read post]