Search for: "Canterbury v. Canterbury"
Results 81 - 100
of 132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2023, 12:17 am
COVID restrictions in Canada In New Brunswick v His Tabernacle Family Church Inc. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:40 pm
The former Archbishop of Canterbury submitted a witness statement stating that cases such of these should be heard by judges with special religious sensitivity. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
If an essay prompt might give an unintended advantage to someone who read The Canterbury Tales, then that's hard to complain about because the student may "deserve" an extra edge. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 1:30 am
Today, 11 June 2022, marks ten years since the start of regular blogging on Law and Religion UK with the post Lay employees and church discipline; this examined the increasingly-complex issue of the employment status and employment rights of lay employees of religious organisations in the case of Fernández Martínez v Spain [2012] ECHR 6030/07. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am
Zoe Ingenhaag, Lexology: Gender critical beliefs in the workplace: on Phoenix v The Open University, Meade v Westminster City Council and Anor and Ali v Reason & Nott. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 6:33 am
In Canterbury v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:47 pm
C’est l’objet de la première partie dont l’approche transversale conduit à dégager les grandes lignes : elle révèle un tronc commun qui traduit l’unité de la matière et permet de mieux en comprendre l’esprit. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:32 am
This came to a head in the furore over the former Archbishop of Canterbury’s intervention in the MacFarlane v Relate case, provoking some very sharp words from Lord Justice Laws. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
The Archbishop of Canterbury has also criticised a “wooden-headed bureaucratic silliness” that prevents people from wearing religious symbols at work. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:36 pm
Smith, for the election and consecration of V. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 12:12 am
Clare Ryan, Strasbourg Observers: Lee v the United Kingdom: A trend toward heightened pleading standards? [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 5:05 am
In Lucia v SEC, the D.C. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 1:44 pm
This Court has repeatedly made it clear that when making an SPO the court has to make a judgment about the future and that the focus at this stage is on the future and not the past (see, for example, per Gage LJ in Sandwell and per Maurice Kay LJ in Canterbury CC v Lowe). [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 02389-20 Shoebridge v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), 14 Confidential sources (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 12231-20 Hannaway v edinburghlive.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 09788-20 A Man v liverpoolecho.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), No breach –… [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:56 pm
In Free Fertility Foundation v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 2:20 pm
Without, in any way, wishing to suggest that I am writing to a theme, I could not help but notice the coverage of the Archbishop of Canterbury in the news and every newspaper today. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 12:51 am
Vicarious liability in the Supreme Court On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v BXB. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 1:20 am
The ECtHR Grand Chamber judgment in Fedotova v Russia on the legal recognition of same-sex couples. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:05 pm
She may have to face a barrage of photographers as she exits the hospital today with her new bundle of joy – but at least she was spared having to invite the Home Secretary and the Archbishop of Canterbury into the birth chamber itself for verification purposes. [read post]
