Search for: "Card+ v. US"
Results 81 - 100
of 6,705
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
The agency explained that the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:01 am
” “Biometric identifiers” are proposed to be defined as “measurable physical characteristics or behaviors used to recognize or verify the identity of an individual, including facial images, voice prints and patterns, retina and iris scans, palm prints and fingerprints, gait, and keyboard usage patterns that are enrolled in a biometric system and templates created by the system. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 2:44 pm
"] From Coffeeshop, LLC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:59 am
Supreme Court confirmed the legality of Amex’s restraints on steering customers in the 2018 American Express v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:05 pm
Ironically, the opinion in this case informs us there was a better path and no one followed it. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:37 am
These were not in the cards before. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
On 1 March 2024, The Rt Hon Lucy Frazer MP, the Secretary of State for Culture Media and Sport, and The Rt Hon James Cleverly MP, the Secretary of State for the Home Department, published their decision to vary a Restriction Order from the Leveson Inquiry to allow the use of the ledger cards for the purpose of the ongoing misuse of private information claim brought by seven claimants against Associated Newspapers. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
Rudnick v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 11:01 am
The PTAB relied on CyberSource Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
O’Brien is a famous decision rejecting a Vietnam War-era challenge to a federal statute prohibiting destruction of draft cards. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 1:54 pm
Regarding data breaches, Transunion LLC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm
Under Lorillard v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 8:22 am
New York’s unique approach likely stems from Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
The ICO also published new guidance for all organisations considering using people’s biometric data. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:58 pm
In Etheridge v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
How can you even engage the conversation when it’s a trump card to say “that can’t be the rule b/c I found one case that says something else. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 2:05 pm
For a free consultation call us at 630-333-0333 or contact us online. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 6:24 pm
Which makes its use at a high-end Szechuan restaurant a curious evolution — from the bottom to the top, so to speak. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:12 am
The fact that a trade mark might be – even primarily – understood as a promotional formula, does not mean that it cannot be perceived as an indication of origin (CJEU, Smart Technologies v OHIM, C-311/11 P, at para. 30). [read post]
