Search for: "Cass v. State of New York" Results 81 - 100 of 101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
  According to Calabresi, Article V tells us that new constitutional law can be made only where three-quarters of the States are in consensus. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 7:01 am
Box 12420 Grand Forks, ND 58208-2420 Phone: (701) 772-6191; (877) 250-2022 (Toll Free) E-mail: thearc@arcuv.com Web: http://www.thearcuppervalley.com The Arc of Cass County P.O. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Guest Blogger
These could include disestablishing or privatizing marriage in favor of a contractual model, or broadening it (or some new legal status) to include caring relationships of whatever number and mix of genders.[3] Ronald C. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:45 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
In an op-ed. published last September in the New York Times called “Happy Illegal Holiday! [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
In light of this recent federal enactment, multiple state laws to the same effect, and even public opinion polls suggesting support for the death penalty in such cases, was the Court's decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Balkin, In Giving Up Our Rights, We'd Lose the War (New Orleans Times-Picayune, September 11th, 2002)4. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:40 am
Treasuries. [32] In September of this year, China became the largest holder of U.S. government debt, holding over $585 billion dollars. [33] Volatile China-U.S. relations could affect U.S. interest rates and lead to unnecessary volatility in the domestic money market, cascading yet again into injurious consequences for global economic recovery. [34] V. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm by Peter L. Strauss
Do we really need to be concerned that newspapers and the public misunderstand United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
Along the way, he cites Cass Sunstein on the “precautionary principle,” which (per Sunstein) holds that “it is appropriate to respond aggressively to low-probability, high-impact events. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am by Ronald Collins
Question:  In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:04 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
Supreme Court’s landmark environmental decision in Michigan v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:06 am by Albert W. Alschuler
They purchased new communications equipment, began cooperating with one another, and made operational plans. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:11 am by Marvin Ammori
(A) Kagan and Distortion in Private Speech, Public PurposeIn Kagan's most-cited law review article on free speech, published in 1996 and entitled Private Speech, Public Purpose (which I also discussed last post), Kagan argues that there is no real difference between the broad and narrow anti-distortion rationales.The New York Times quotes the key language from her article. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
At minimum, bribery covers not just the taking but the giving of a bribe, and state of mind is key. [read post]