Search for: "Cassell v. Cassell"
Results 81 - 100
of 273
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
ExtraditionIndia v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melançon LLP v. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Cassels Brock & Blackwell 2016 SCC 30 https://t.co/EtM8LrsxCr -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2016-07-19 https://t.co/ntTrWc5jB1 -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2016-07-19 https://t.co/Oq68fhLS4p -> Owner of Most-Visited Illegal File-Sharing Website Charged with Criminal Copyright Infringement https://t.co/IR5ZRggGrW -> Gavel to Gavel: Dealing with a software copyright audit https://t.co/2y0U2ayYt2 -> Federal Court of Appeal Comments on New Tort of… [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Cassels Brock & Blackwell 2016 SCC 30 https://t.co/EtM8LrsxCr -> [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 4:25 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has released its decision in Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melancon LLP v Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, 2016 SCC 30 (available here). [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:00 am
On Wednesday 8 June 2016 the Privy Council will hear the appeal of Cassell & Anor v The Queen (Montserrat) concerning whether the Court of Appeal had been wrong to dismiss the appeal and not give direction for a re-trial. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 4:05 pm
The case was brought against Dershowitz by Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell, both victims’ rights attorneys, last year. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 11:35 am
In the news roundup, we bring back Apple v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
Paul Schabas, Iris Fischer and Helen Richards, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP, Toronto, Canada [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:07 am
Paul Cassell, to present the other side of the story. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 8:41 am
Civil procedure — Default judgment — Motion to vacate Even parties who default are entitled to some quantum of notice and opportunity before their failure to respond turns into a judgment. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 2:19 pm
In Miller v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Royal Bank of Canada v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:05 am
In Archer v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 1:21 pm
FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP/Getty Images The case is a Connecticut trial court case, Archer v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 4:51 am
Hatch’s pitch for the law provides: The Amy and Vicky Act creates an effective, balanced restitution process for victims of child pornography that also responds to the Supreme Court’s decision in Paroline v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Our guest poster today is Chris Horkins of the Canadian firm Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP. [read post]
