Search for: "Cater v. Cater" Results 81 - 100 of 770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2018, 4:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
But I think that's not right as a matter of Free Exercise Clause precedent, which (at least as the Court interpreted it in Employment Division v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 2:03 am by sally
Torfaen County Borough Council v Douglas Willis Ltd [2012] EWHC 296 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 37 “In order to found a conviction for an offence under regulation 44(1)(d) of the Food Labelling Regulations 1996, a prosecuting authority was required to prove, to the criminal standard: (i) that the food, at the point that it was ready for delivery to the ultimate consumer or caterer, was ‘highly perishable’ and so required then and thereafter to be labelled with a… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:27 pm by Ken
Certainly she doesn’t seem bright enough to be familiar with Hustler v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:09 am by Joy Waltemath
The employer, a catering business, added an 11percent mandatory surcharge to customer invoices on delivery orders. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
Discrimination The principle in Thlimennos v Greece requires unlike cases to be treated differently [40]. [read post]