Search for: "Center for Constitutional Rights v. Department of Justice et al" Results 81 - 100 of 157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2012, 3:18 pm by Lauren
In July 2009, real parties Peter Plotkin et al., filed a suit against the City for inverse condemnation and damages due to condemnation blight. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 6:27 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Kinston case, LaRoque, et al., v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm by Pace Law School Library
L. 807-811 (2011).Thomas, Seth M., et al. 2009-2010 environmental law survey. 44 Ind. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm by Steve Davies
’” ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources, “Endangered Species Act,” 172 (Donald Baur et al., eds., 2nd ed. 2010) (citing National Wildlife Federation v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
For example, in a federal District Court in Lynchburg, Va., the Justice Department in August 2010 filed a brief arguing — among other points — that the Anti-Injunction Act barred that lawsuit. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
At 10 a.m. next Monday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on a case that implicates the constitutional authority of all three branches of the government: Zivotofsky, et al., v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:42 am by Lyle Denniston
(Filed by the Justice Department for the Obama Administration.)* Florida, et al., v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
Department of Treasury, 11-45, which was relisted after the October 7 Conference. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am by Kiera Flynn
Amicus brief of Columbia Legal Services et al. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:59 pm by Lyle Denniston
Department of Health and Human Services, et al., v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am by Christa Culver
SchefferAmicus brief of Professors of Legal History et al. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Mincolla (Case No. 1003-2009), Justice Rumsey held that imputing homosexuality to an individual constitutes libel per se. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm by Lyle Denniston
Fox Television Stations, et al. (10-1293), but the protection from children from profanity and nudity considered harmful to them is directly at issue. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionPetitioners' reply (forthcoming)Amicus brief of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence et al. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by John Elwood
United States, 10-885 (for the second time), all of which present questions involving whether “dual-status technicians” who perform civilian roles within military departments may sue the government for employment discrimination under Title VII, notwithstanding the Court’s holding in Feres v. [read post]