Search for: "Certification of Questions of Law to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review"
Results 81 - 100
of 108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2016, 5:10 am
Recently, the government unsealed a November ruling by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:52 am
The WP repeatedly praises the improvements made in Privacy Shield, and recognizes the panoply of protections provided under US law, including the review of government certifications by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:19 am
Again the question of proportionality of the legislation is questionable. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
The Irish High Court Decision Following the revelations about US surveillance by Edward Snowden, an Austrian resident Max Schrems complained to the Irish data Commissioner about the transfers. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 10:18 pm
Tuesday, October 6th at 9:30 am: The American Enterprise Institute will convene a panel on Domestic Surveillance on Foreign Shores: The Case of Microsoft's Servers in Ireland. [read post]
14 May 2015, 8:51 pm
The realistic question, then, is whether the Senate can and will can pass this bill. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 1:30 pm
Despite the title, the report is really a condensed history of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC or the Court), with the Brennan Center’s judgements about what has gone wrong with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) itself. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:52 pm
Congress and the President asked the Board to review the use of Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act and Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act, as well as the operations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
That is remarkably broad provision as it allows the federal court to issue warrants that violate the laws of other countries, including foreign privacy laws. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:21 pm
” The ACLU also has endorsed the bill, in rather strong terms: To put this in historical context: If the Senate passes the bill, it will be the first time since passage of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in 1978 that the chamber has taken action to constrain the intelligence community, and the first time Congress has a real shot at restoring the crucial privacy protections lost in the Patriot Act. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:29 pm
We expect that the FISA court’s review of these targeting procedures in the course of the court’s periodic review of Section 702 certifications will include an assessment of whether the revised procedures provide adequate guidance to ensure that targeting decisions are reasonably designed to acquire foreign intelligence information relevant to the subject of one of the certifications approved by… [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
Since the verdict, the defendant has sought to undo his conviction, questioning both the government’s compliance with provisions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), and those provisions’ very legality. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:30 pm
Columbia Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 37, 2006). [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:30 pm
The “Wall” In this section, Gonzales and Mueller detailed the implementation history of FISA, which requires “certification from a high-ranking Executive Branch official that ‘the purpose’ of the surveillance or search was to gather foreign intelligence information. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:37 pm
That request’s staggering scope wasn’t at all lost on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (“FISC”) judge who, in 2004, heard the application and eventually granted it. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 7:08 am
Edward Snowden’s disclosures and subsequent government declassifications have prompted a wave of proposals to retool the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (“FISA”). [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 3:10 pm
The FISA Amendments Act of 2008 requires the Attorney General and the DNI to assess NSA compliance with Section 702 targeting and minimization procedures and to submit their findings to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) and certain congressional committees at least once every six months. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:48 am
The legislation can be broken down into four broad categories: 1) substantive reforms to the laws the NSA believes allow it to conduct its surveillance programs, 2) disclosure of the FISA Court opinions that determined the programs were legal, 3) general reporting of the number and types of surveillance orders received by recipients and how many users affected, and 4) reforms to the FISA Court. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:21 am
One response is that such interception is just the accidental byproduct of otherwise lawful foreign intelligence surveillance activities, but of course, that’s the nub of the current debate. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 1:19 pm
Have intelligence or law enforcement partners said anything? [read post]
