Search for: "Champagne v. Champagne"
Results 81 - 100
of 305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2017, 7:13 am
First, they explore the district court ruling in Salim v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:01 am
Teaching trademark law for the first time this spring, I fielded several questions from students on a lesser known corner of trademark law: certification marks. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 8:25 am
See also, Champagne Louis Roederer S.A. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 8:33 am
Smith v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 1:01 am
From allies sipping champagne to celebrate one another’s joining the Court, Black, Frankfurter, Douglas, and Jackson had formed camps and become bitter enemies. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
In Roederer, the defendant sold Spanish sparkling wine under the name CRISTALINO, infringing the claimant’s rights in its CRISTAL brand of champagne. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
But in allowing in principle the human rights counter claim, the Urbaser v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:12 am
See Eleonora Rosati’s fresh review on the CJEU judgment in ITV Broadcasting v TVCatchup, C-275/15 (TV Catchup 2) – a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal of England and Wales.Corks popping following account of profits decisionEver-productive Kat Eibhlin Vardy also analyses the recent High Court decision of Champagne Louis Roederer v J Garcia Carrion SA & Others [2017] EWHC 289 (Ch) which “has a number of… [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 9:26 am
See Eleonora Rosati’s fresh review on the CJEU judgment in ITV Broadcasting v TVCatchup, C-275/15 (TV Catchup 2) – a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal of England and Wales.Corks popping following account of profits decisionEver-productive Kat Eibhlin Vardy also analyses the recent High Court decision of Champagne Louis Roederer v J Garcia Carrion SA & Others [2017] EWHC 289 (Ch) which “has a number of quirks in its factual… [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
BackgroundThe recent High Court decision of Champagne Louis Roederer (CLR) v J Garcia Carrion SA & Others [2017] EWHC 289 (Ch) has a number of quirks in its factual matrix. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 7:12 am
Investigated for New Year’s champagne. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:41 am
| The champagne of trade mark disputes | Around the IP Blogs! [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 1:32 am
| The champagne of trade mark disputes | Around the IP Blogs! [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:49 am
| The champagne of trade mark disputes | Around the IP Blogs! [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:34 am
I The champagne of trade mark disputes I Jaguar Land Rover DEFEND[ER]s its trade mark I Länsförsäkringar, Länsförsäkringar, bork, bork, bork! [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 10:28 pm
See Cariou v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:01 am
* The champagne of trade mark disputesRosie Burbidge opens a seasonal bottle of fizz -- this time around the question of consent to use a trade mark. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 6:04 am
This time around the question of consent to use a trade mark.This dispute has it all, polo players, champagne and contracts! [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 11:13 am
However, the California Court of Appeals in People v. [read post]
