Search for: "Chemical Manufacturers Association v. Environmental Protection Agency" Results 81 - 95 of 95
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2010, 5:06 pm by Steven M. Taber
Another was filed by a coalition that includes the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), the American Petroleum Institute, the Corn Refiners Association, the National Association of Home Builders, the National Oilseed Processors Association, the National Petrochemical and Refiners Association, and the Western States Petroleum Association. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:25 am by David Doniger
  Senator Murkowski wants to overturn the Environmental Protection Agency’s scientific finding that global warming pollution is dangerous to Americans’ health and to their environment. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
-based pipe manufacturer pleads guilty to environmental charges, to pay $4 million. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Seth Borenstein, The Associated Press, December 6, 2009 With the world losing the battle against global warming so far, experts are warning that humans need to follow nature’s example: Adapt or die. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 3:59 pm by David Doniger
For the first two decades, the bill will provide allowances to energy-intensive manufacturers making products (such as steel, aluminum, cement, and chemicals) that are subject to strong international competition. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 10:26 am
  In reality, the average amount of lead a woman would be exposed to when using cosmetics is 1,000 times less than the amount she would get from eating, breathing and drinking water that meets Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) drinking water standards, according to the Cosmetics, Toiletry and Fragrance Association (CTFA). [read post]