Search for: "Chess v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm by Joel R. Brandes
She testified that they interacted in person for a total of five or six times, including a February 2021 visit to her home, when he cooked a meal and played chess. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Applera Corp (Patently-O) (271 Patent Blog) District Court S D Indiana: Stay pending reexam lifted prior to issuance of reexam certificate (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: United States is not an indispensible party to false marking action: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
United States, which reawakened Commerce Clause review of federal legislation yet hardly ushered in a new era of robust judicial review; and District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 3:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
I think it would be highly plausible in many other contexts; if the next world chess champion, for instance, were selected based on the chess federation's promise that the next champion would be Hispanic (or even that all Hispanic players would be spotted a pawn), that would surely cheapen his success. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
On 29 June 2023, judgment was handed down in R v Dent, 2023 ONCA 460. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 9:56 am by Lovechilde
In chess this move is called flipping the board over and stomping away. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:56 am
e, nezlob se” was a game of the same rank as chess or draughts/checkers, they then explained this similarity as meaning that the game was in the public domain. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm by Larry
Court of International Trade decision in Rubbermaid Commercial Products, LLC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 3:06 pm by Mark Graber
  This, as political scientists and historians are taught in graduate school, is a major controversy with Gerald Rosenberg’s The Hollow Hope laying down a challenge that has never been fully answered to demonstrate powerful political effects from the judicial decision in Brown v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am by Florian Mueller
QE's approach of not teaming up with patent attorneys in these types of proceedings is as unusual as it is controversial in the German IP law community, but in the proceedings I watch there is no indication of them being less effective on their own.All three parties (Apple, Google, Microsoft) also dispatched in-house counsel from the United States, which speaks to the significance of this case.The U.S. equivalent of this patent is still at issue in a Motorola v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:44 am by Benjamin Wittes
— Anne-Marie Slaughter (@SlaughterAM) October 17, 2015 Putin v. [read post]