Search for: "Chief Justice of the U.S. States Court of Federal Claims" Results 81 - 100 of 4,306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
” Unless, opined the court, Chief Justice Marshall’s test implicitly exempts cases instituted in a military court, the case is now appellate. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:59 am by Don Cruse
Chief Justice Roberts wrote today for a unanimous Court, holding that federal law did not in these circumstances require the Texas legal-malpractice claim to have been brought in federal court. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 9:41 am by Ryke Longest
O’Connell conceded to Chief Justice John Roberts that the federal interests under the 1906 convention could be asserted by the United States as an amicus. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 5:54 pm by Howard Friedman
 He finds that in the views of the dissent in the Holm case:the court agrees with Chief Justice Durham['s dissent] that the “purports to marry” prong should be interpreted “as referring to an individual’s claim of entry into a legal union recognized by the state as marriage. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:16 am by Jonathan H. Adler
EPA, in which the Supreme Court has already found standing for states to sue the federal government when objecting to administration policies. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 8:00 pm by Howard Friedman
In a decision by the Court of Federal Claims (see prior posting) which was summarily affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the court rejected claims by a Navy Chaplain that he was that he was wrongfully discharged from the Navy. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 10:07 pm by Barry Barnett
Supreme Court last week revived state-law antitrust claims against natural-gas pipelines. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 10:26 am by Mike Scarcella
At issue is whether Leon should have assessed whether the earlier suit in Indianapolis federal district court met a heightened pleading standard of a rule of federal civil procedure that requires a claim to be presented with particularities. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”Shinn is not the first time that conservative Justices have elevated finality over justice even if doing so risks executing the innocent.In 1993, Herrera v Collins, with then Chief Justice Rehnquist writing for another six-Justice majority, held that a death row inmate was not entitled to federal habeas corpus relief when his petition was based on a claim that new evidence proved his innocence but did not allege any other… [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
A very interesting (but legally unsurprising) decision from a federal district court in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 9:12 am
The majority was written by Justice Kennedy, the dissent by Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm by Colby Pastre
Supreme Court to overturn state tax laws that discriminate against interstate commerce or otherwise impede it, a power Justice Kennedy (as well as Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito) have exercised on occasion. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Julian Ku
Instead, Chief Justice Roberts emphasized that “United States Law…does not rule the world,” a phrase he first used in his opinion for the Court in Kiobel v. [read post]