Search for: "Childs v. State of California (1983)"
Results 81 - 100
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
Dist. of California, 705 F.2d 1143, 1145 (9th Cir. 1983) ("We thus find that the public and press have a first amendment right of access to pretrial documents in general. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Iskanian, 14-341 allows us to linger a bit longer in California. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:29 pm
California Appellate Districts, August 19, 2008 Zumbrun Law Firm v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
Legal abortion obviously conveys a “benefit” in a comparative sense: not abortion as an absolute good but legal abortion as compared to a back-alley butcher or to state-enforced child-bearing. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
Last up, out of the California Court of Appeals, is Fernandez v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
After losing in the trial and appellate courts, petitioners seek cert. on the issue of “[w]hether the Commerce Clause allows California to impose a complete ban on the sale of wholesome USDA-approved poultry products from other States and countries … based solely on the agricultural methods used by out-of-state farmers who raise their animals entirely beyond California’s borders. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm
§ 1983 for malicious prosecution. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:29 am
Among the 707 cases, only six prosecutors — 0.8% — were disciplined by the State Bar of California. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm
Dillon, 34 Cal.3d 441, 479, 194 Cal.Rptr. 390, 668 P.2d 697 (1983) (emphasis added). [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:08 am
The question in Perry v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:46 am
California, supra, at 172, and Palko v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
For the Rolling Stones, when you discount those songs generally considered too raunchy for mainstream radio (one from Beggars Banquet, one from Let It Bleed and one from Goats Head Soup, you can guess which ones), we’d say the disrespected Stones song we like most is Child of the Moon. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
California Coastal Commission did not apply to the ordinance where the ordinance did not require Watson to dedicate any portion of his property to either the City's or the public's use. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 In re Sims, No. 06-0644 In an inmate's 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action alleging excessive force, inmate's petition for writ of mandamus challenging an order requiring him to produce his mental health records is granted because: 1) a plaintiff does not forfeit the psychotherapist-patient privilege merely by asserting a claim for injuries that do not include emotional damage, or by stating that he suffers from depression or… [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
The Court rejects concerns that virtual child pornography or sex between youthful-looking adult actors might be covered by the term "simulated sexual intercourse. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:21 am
Siers: Reasoning that, under State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Southerland, 12-215, which concerns a Children’s Services case worker and qualified immunity for Section 1983 claims. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Opinion below (10th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply Amicus brief of the American Legion Department of California Amicus brief of nine states Title: CropLife America v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
California, 14-5442. [read post]
