Search for: "Christian Louboutin"
Results 81 - 100
of 237
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2012, 7:16 pm
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 2ND CIRCUIT was even more dramatic in its timing, waiting until the first day of Fashion Week to finally release its opinion in Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:08 pm
Christian Louboutin’s shoes are instantly recognizable by their red soles. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm
September 5, 2012, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals came to a decision regarding one of the most closely watched cases in trademark law, Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:59 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:46 am
Today, however, I must give you an update on a recent decision in the legal action brought by luxury shoe brand Christian Louboutin against design house Yves Saint Laurent for trademark protection for the Louboutin famed lacquered red bottoms. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:32 am
In the case of Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:06 am
Yves Saint Laurent: Score one for Louboutin http://wp.me/p2tK1d-1S Christian Louboutin wins trademark rights to red soles, as long as they contrast with the rest of the shoe http://on.wsj.com/R8nsZo [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:58 am
"Designer Christian Louboutin can claim trademark protection for the red outsole on his women's shoes, but not if the rest of the shoe is also red, a federal appellate panel ruled yesterday, allowing rival Yves Saint-Laurent to continue selling an entirely red shoe. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:16 am
In Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:49 pm
More than one year after a U.S. federal district court denied a preliminary injunction against Yves Saint Laurent (YSL) and issued a decision invalidating Louboutin’s red sole trademark, the Second Circuit has rendered Christian Louboutin’s iconic “Chinese red” soles to be a valid, protectable, and enforceable trademark.Specifically, the Second Circuit reasoned that, “[w]e see no reason why a single-color mark in the specific context of… [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:36 pm
At long last, here is a pdf link to the decision, and here is the Second Circuit Court of Appeals summary in a nutshell: “We conclude that the District Court’s holding that a single color can never serve as a trademark in the fashion industry, Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:08 pm
Fashionistas rejoice: Christian Louboutin has won the trademark rights to his signature red soles! [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:07 pm
Earlier today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:07 pm
Earlier today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:54 am
Disagreeing with a federal district court that earlier denied a preliminary injunction sought by a French designer after another high-fashion industry icon allegedly infringed on his trademarked red-soled shoes, a federal appeals court Wednesday said that Christian Louboutin is entitled to seek a legal remedy except when the shoes in question are entirely red. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 10:53 am
IPNews® - Luxury shoemaker Christian Louboutin won a victory in the Second Circuit on Wednesday upholding his trademark protection for his signature red-soled shoes, in a setback for rival Yves Saint Laurent in its efforts to evade Louboutin's infringement suit. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 10:51 am
Image filed with Trademark office Christian Louboutin wins trademark protection for his lacquered red sole shoes! [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
California - The Second Circuit on Wednesday ruled that French high fashion shoemaker Christian Louboutin is entitled to trademark protection for the iconic red soles on its shoes, dealing a blow to competing fashion house Yves Saint Laurent in its bid to outfox Louboutin's infringement claims. [read post]